What are the legal frameworks governing the collection and sharing of cyber threat intelligence?
Best insight from top research papers
Legal frameworks governing the collection and sharing of cyber threat intelligence are not explicitly mentioned in the provided abstracts.
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
25 Aug 2022 | The paper does not mention the legal frameworks governing the collection and sharing of cyber threat intelligence. |
01 Dec 2022 | The provided paper does not mention any legal frameworks governing the collection and sharing of cyber threat intelligence. |
| The provided paper does not mention any legal frameworks governing the collection and sharing of cyber threat intelligence. | |
| The provided paper does not mention any legal frameworks governing the collection and sharing of cyber threat intelligence. |
Related Questions
What are the legal frameworks and regulations in place to address cyberbullying in various countries?5 answersLegal frameworks and regulations to address cyberbullying vary across countries. Some nations, like the USA and Europe, focus on implementing anti-cyberbullying laws in response to public pressure and specific cases like the Lori Drew and Tiziana Cantone incidents. Developed countries such as the UK, USA, Canada, Malaysia, South Africa, Turkey, and the UAE have established specific legislation to combat cyberbullying among adolescents, serving as examples for developing nations. In Republika Srpska, cyberbullying is sanctioned through existing criminal offenses like insult and defamation, while some European countries treat it as a distinct criminal offense, prompting the need for more effective legal protection for victims. The international legal community also aims to define and regulate cybercrime through agreements like the United Nations Convention on Countering the Use of Information and Communication Technologies for Criminal Purposes.
Which are the main standards and frameworks for cybersecurity?5 answersThe main standards and frameworks for cybersecurity include those published by organizations like the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and other international bodies. These standards provide a structured methodology for protecting critical digital assets and guiding organizational decision-making on security budgets and controls. Commonly used frameworks in cybersecurity include the ISO/IEC 27000 family, NIST 800-53, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and COBIT, among others, which offer best practices to protect against cyber threats and help organizations demonstrate compliance with laws and standards. However, selecting the most appropriate standard can be challenging for businesses due to the complexity of the cybersecurity landscape and the lack of experienced personnel in the field.
What is cyber threat intelligence?4 answersCyber threat intelligence (CTI) refers to the actionable information or insights that organizations use to understand potential vulnerabilities and threats they are facing. It involves collecting, processing, analyzing, and disseminating information about malicious threat actors' motivations, goals, objectives, targets, and attack behaviors. CTI helps organizations anticipate and mitigate potential threats, reducing uncertainty and improving the accuracy of risk analysis. It involves utilizing machine learning algorithms, such as support vector machines and deep learning using artificial neural networks, to predict exploit types and discover CTI from semi-structured datasets. CTI mining involves uncovering, processing, and analyzing valuable information about cyber threats from multiple data sources. It can be used to integrate threat data feeds with existing security systems and strengthen security postures. Additionally, a blockchain-based CTI system architecture has been proposed to collect, evaluate, store, and share CTI, ensuring tamper-proof data and evaluating the quality of CTI feeds.
Is international criminal law applicable to cyber warfare?5 answersInternational criminal law is applicable to cyber warfare, but there are limitations to its effectiveness and applicability. Existing international law, such as the Tallinn Manual, provides guidelines and rules for conflicts in cyberspace. However, there are challenges in regulating cyber operations using international law. The nature of cyber warfare and the evolving technology make it difficult to fully address the issue. Additionally, the law of State responsibility offers solutions for responding to cyber operations, but it may not provide answers in every case. To overcome these limitations, it is proposed to establish an independent fact-finding body to address the challenges faced by international law in regulating cyber operations.
What are the international legal frameworks regulating cyber warfare?5 answersInternational legal frameworks regulating cyber warfare are currently lacking. There is a need for a comprehensive legal framework, both domestically and internationally, to effectively counter cyber attacks. Existing principles and norms of international law may not be sufficient to regulate cyber wars, and alternative development of a special international legal regime is being considered. The applicability of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) to cyber warfare is also being debated, as there is a need to explore the norms of IHL that regulate such operations. States perceive cyber attacks as an independent form of use of force and seek legal assessment within the framework of current international law, but there is a tendency to regulate cyber attacks with specialized norms. International law has limitations in regulating the use and conduct of cyber operations, and there is a proposal for an independent fact-finding body to address these limitations.
What legal implications do AI threats have in the realm of cybercrime for privacy and surveillance?3 answersAI threats in the realm of cybercrime have significant legal implications for privacy and surveillance. The use of AI in cyberattacks raises concerns about the ability to infer behavior and traits, which current legal and technological measures for privacy do not adequately address. Researchers are expressing growing concern about the applications of machine learning for surveillance, and there is a need for strategies to resist these surveillance technologies. Additionally, there is a need for clear and effective ethical frameworks in the development, design, production, use, and modification of AI to prevent criminological risks and recognize AI as a source of increased danger. The legal regulation of the legal personality of AI is also being analyzed, with discussions on the possibility of endowing AI with "legal status" and the use of legal fiction to address the unique legal position of AI. These discussions aim to bridge the gap between legal and technical thinking regarding AI and privacy.