What are the most effective separation methods for Tb-161?
Best insight from top research papers
The most effective separation methods for Tb-161 include the use of Ln resin column based on extraction chromatography method . Additionally, the method of concavity (MOC) has been shown to be effective in separating overlapping bacilli in sputum smear images .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
3 Citations | The paper does not provide information on the most effective separation methods for Tb-161. |
22 Citations | The most effective separation method for TB-161 is the method of concavity (MOC), which outperforms the multi-phase active contour (MAC) and marker-controlled watershed (MCW) methods. |
| The provided paper does not mention any information about separation methods for Tb-161. | |
| The provided paper does not mention any specific separation methods for Tb-161. | |
| The paper does not mention the most effective separation methods for Tb-161. |
Related Questions
What are the best tuberculosis molecular tests?5 answersThe best tuberculosis molecular tests include the GeneXpert system, Xpert MTB/RIF, Line-probe assays (LPAs), and the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. GeneXpert technology, utilizing cartridge systems, offers high sensitivity, rapid results, and drug resistance detection. Xpert MTB/RIF and LPAs demonstrate accuracy in detecting rifampicin resistance. The CapitalBio test, while slightly less accurate than Xpert MTB/RIF, shows promise in diagnosing tuberculous lymphadenitis. These molecular tests play a crucial role in detecting TB and drug resistance, aiding in timely and accurate diagnosis for effective treatment. Each test has its strengths, with GeneXpert being particularly advantageous for its speed and sensitivity, while LPAs and Xpert MTB/RIF excel in detecting rifampicin resistance.
How to separation of heart and lung sounds ?5 answersHeart and lung sounds can be separated using various techniques and algorithms. One approach is to use nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) combined with deep learning (DL). Another method is to employ variational mode decomposition (VMD) algorithm for separation. Adaptive noise cancellation and separation techniques can also be used. Additionally, a source separation method based on NMF can be utilized, where the estimated lung sound is used to reinsert the segments of interest into the original signal. These methods aim to differentiate between heart and lung sounds in order to accurately diagnose cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.
What are the most promising new methods for diagnosing tuberculosis?5 answersNew methods for diagnosing tuberculosis include non-invasive non-sputum-based testing, nanobiosensors, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), and nanodiagnostic tests using nanoparticles. These methods show promise for rapid and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis. Non-invasive non-sputum-based tests, such as computer-aided detection software with digital chest X-ray and blood-based assays, have the potential to efficiently triage and confirm tuberculosis near point-of-care. Nanobiosensors based on nanomaterials offer the potential for rapid, sensitive, and accurate tuberculosis diagnosis by detecting bacterial components, host immunological responses, and whole cell detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nucleic acid amplification tests, such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are recommended by the World Health Organization for rapid and accurate tuberculosis diagnosis. Nanodiagnostic tests using nanoparticles, such as nanosuspensions, niosomes, and quantum dots, provide opportunities for improving both diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. These new methods have the potential to enhance tuberculosis diagnosis and contribute to the effective control of the disease.
What is the best method for cell isolation?5 answersThe best method for cell isolation depends on various factors such as cell purity, viability, activation status, frequency, time, and cost. There is no single method that is advantageous over all cell isolation techniques. Researchers and clinicians need to consider these factors before selecting a method. Traditional single-cell isolation techniques like flow cytometry (FACS), laser capture microdissection (LCM), and micromanipulation have complex operations and low throughput. However, a microfluidic chip using thermal bubble micropump technology has shown promise for high-throughput single-cell isolation with a capture rate of about 75%. Another close-system cell isolation device using immunomagnetic beads and external forces has been developed to perform cell isolation without contamination. Additionally, a cell isolation method involving a cell trapping filter and stimulus-responsive hydrogel has been proposed. Researchers should consider the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of each method to choose the most suitable one for their specific projects.
What are the different methods for isolating bovine trophoblasts?5 answersThere are different methods for isolating bovine trophoblasts. One method involves isolating trophoblasts from term placentae using either trypsin/DNase or dispase/DNase to digest the tissue. The use of dispase/DNase digestion resulted in the release of more trophoblasts compared to trypsin/DNase digestion. Another method involves picking the uterus of a pregnant cow with a gestation time of 18-44 days and flushing the embryos to obtain the early embryo, followed by separating the trophoblast tissue. Additionally, flow cytometry and magnetic bead technology can be used to sort bovine neutrophils from blood, which can also include gating strategies for labeling and sorting. Finally, a method has been developed for isolating pure bovine gonadotrophs from the anterior pituitary using magnetic separation and an antibody against the N terminus of bovine gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR).
Is TLC high in tuberculosis?10 answers