What factors contribute to the difference in cost structure between coal-based power plants and new energy power plants?
Best insight from top research papers
The difference in cost structure between coal-based power plants and new energy power plants can be attributed to several factors. For coal-based power plants, the largest proportion of the cost comes from fuel expenses, carbon emission costs, and construction costs . The rising international coal prices and increasing environmental costs also contribute to the overall cost of coal power plants . On the other hand, new energy power plants, such as renewable plants, have different cost factors. These include construction costs, fuel expenses, environmental regulations, and financing costs . Government energy, environmental, and economic policies can also affect the cost structure of new energy power plants . Additionally, optimizing the fuel cost through coal blending proportion can help reduce costs for power plants .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The factors that contribute to the difference in cost structure between coal-based power plants and new energy power plants include government incentives, capital costs, fuel costs, and air emissions controls. | |
Open access•Dissertation 04 Oct 2017 | The provided paper does not provide information on the factors contributing to the difference in cost structure between coal-based power plants and new energy power plants. |
Open access•Proceedings Article 01 Jan 2007 5 Citations | The provided paper does not discuss the cost structure difference between coal-based power plants and new energy power plants. |
| The provided paper does not discuss the cost structure of new energy power plants or compare it to coal-based power plants. | |
22 Feb 2023 | The provided paper does not discuss the cost structure difference between coal-based power plants and new energy power plants. |
Related Questions
What are the environmental impacts of a coal power plant?4 answersCoal-fired power plants have significant environmental impacts. They contribute to acid rain through sulfur and nitrogen oxide emissions, release hazardous elements like arsenic and antimony into the ecosystem, emit greenhouse gases leading to climate change, and cause air and water pollution. These plants generate fly and bottom ash containing heavy metals that can contaminate soil and water, affecting human health. Implementing pollution control technologies like electrostatic precipitators and activated carbon adsorption can help mitigate these impacts. However, increasing the performance of certain control units may have higher overall environmental impacts due to energy costs, emphasizing the need for sustainable solutions in coal power generation. Regular monitoring, proper ash disposal, and transitioning to renewable energy sources are crucial for minimizing the environmental footprint of coal-fired power plants.
What are the environmental costs of coal energy?5 answersThe environmental costs of coal energy are significant. Coal production, transportation, and utilization generate large quantities of external costs, including pollution and ecological impacts. In South Africa, the emission costs associated with coal power plants represent 69.2% of the total cost of producing electricity. In China, the external costs of coal in southwestern regions are estimated at USD 73.5 billion, accounting for 6.5% of the provincial GDP. In Inner Mongolia, the total external environmental cost of coal is estimated to be 87373 billion yuan, with production, transportation, and utilization accounting for significant portions. These costs include air pollution, damage to aquatic ecosystems, and negative impacts on human health. The environmental costs of coal-fired power plants vary spatially, highlighting the need for siting decisions based on environmental costs.
What are the energy cost in plant factory?4 answersPlant factories have varying energy costs depending on factors such as location, design, and operational choices. Energy consumption ranges from 6.2 to 12.0 kWh per kg of lettuce produced in the United States. In terms of purchased energy, greenhouses that utilize freely available solar energy for photosynthesis have an advantage over plant factories, which rely on artificial lighting. For example, the production of 1 kg of lettuce in a plant factory requires an input of 247 kWh of electricity, compared to 70-211 kWh in greenhouses in different locations. However, plant factories can achieve higher productivity and resource efficiency compared to greenhouses. They outperform even the most efficient greenhouse in terms of energy efficiency, with plant factories using 1411 MJ per kg of dry weight compared to 1699 MJ in the most efficient greenhouse. Additionally, plant factories can achieve considerable reductions in resource consumption, such as 100% reduction in pesticide use and 95% reduction in irrigation water use.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of different types of power plants?5 answersDifferent types of power plants have unique advantages and disadvantages. Gas turbine units, for example, offer certain benefits but also have drawbacks. A study comparing power plant dependability in the United States found that each type of power plant has its own set of benefits and drawbacks, and a mixture of power generation technologies is best for grid dependability. Renewable energy generation systems, such as wind, photovoltaic (PV), biomass, and hydropower, provide a more sustainable solution than fossil fuels, but they also have environmental impacts. Hydropower plants are generally considered more environmentally friendly than other renewable electricity generation systems. A multicriteria analysis of different power plant types found that geothermal, wind, and photovoltaic power plants are excellent choices in most cases, while biomass and hydro are preferred over nuclear and fossil fuel options.
How do different types of thermal power plants compare in terms of efficiency?5 answersDifferent types of thermal power plants have been compared in terms of efficiency. The efficiency ranking of different types of power plants in three different super-efficiency methods is almost similar. Centralized thermal plants and cogeneration/trigeneration systems have been compared using efficiency indicators, and both methods achieve similar results when using the thermal efficiency indicator. The thermal efficiency of the power plant system increases with increasing power load. Combined cycle power plants are found to be more efficient than other power plants, with gas power plants having the lowest efficiency. An illustrative example shows that recovering the thermal energy of flue gases in a combined cycle power plant can significantly improve efficiency. Overall, the efficiency of different types of thermal power plants can vary, with combined cycle power plants generally being more efficient than other types.
What are the impacts of coal-fired power plants on the economy?5 answersCoal-fired power plants have significant impacts on the economy. The usage of different coal compositions affects the economic feasibility of operating units with higher efficiency, determining whether supercritical and ultra-supercritical technologies are economically viable in the long term. Coal-based power plants are considered one of the worst pollution-causing industries, releasing solid, liquid, and gaseous elements that can damage local agricultural resources. The emissions and wastes from coal-fired power plants can lead to environmental issues and health risks for those living and working near the plants. The economic benefits of building and operating power plants depend on the availability and utilization of local industries and services, as well as the source of fuel. Overall, coal-fired power plants have both positive and negative impacts on the economy, with considerations for environmental and health effects.