What is logical argumment?
Best insight from top research papers
Logical argumentation refers to the process of drawing logically justified inferences from conflicting information using formal frameworks. It involves modeling non-monotonic reasoning with both defeasible and strict assumptions, aiming to identify well-behaved argumentative models that adhere to rationality postulates . The concept of logical pluralism challenges the traditional view of a single correct logic, proposing that there can be multiple valid logics with different interpretations and properties . Additionally, logic plays a crucial role in language understanding through 'logical pragmatics,' which focuses on the structure of arguments for persuasive communication and its impact on the audience . Understanding logical reasoning is essential for critical thinking, as highlighted in educational frameworks, emphasizing the importance of teaching formal and everyday reasoning strategies to students for improved logical thinking skills .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Logical argument is a structured reasoning process based on rules of logic to derive conclusions from given premises, crucial for formal and everyday reasoning tasks among secondary school students. | |
| Logical argument refers to the structure of persuasive reasoning used in communication. The paper introduces "logical pragmatics" as the study of argument structure for effective persuasion in language. | |
| A logical argument is valid in N4 if it necessarily preserves evidence, as per Carnielli and Rodrigues' epistemic interpretation of logical systems, supporting logical pluralism based on different interpretations. | |
| Logical argumentation is a method for non-monotonic reasoning with conflicting information. This paper provides a postulate-driven study on the properties, semantics, and inference relations of logical argumentation frameworks. | |
| A logical argument is a fundamental concept in logical pluralism, challenging the traditional view of deductive validity by suggesting multiple correct ways for an argument to be valid. |
Related Questions
What was Ramose ontological argument?5 answersRamose's ontological argument is not mentioned in the provided abstracts.
What are types of logical fallacies?4 answersLogical fallacies are errors in reasoning that can lead to incorrect or invalid arguments. Some common types of logical fallacies include circular explanation, affirming the consequent, reification, poisoning the well, two-wrong fallacy, and manipulation of emotion. These fallacies can occur in various contexts, such as medical practice, substance use disorder research, television debates, and legal opinions. Understanding logical fallacies is important for clinicians, researchers, debaters, and writers to recognize and avoid faulty reasoning in their respective fields. By being aware of these fallacies, individuals can improve the quality of their arguments and decision-making processes.
What are some tips for spotting logical fallacies in arguments?5 answersTo spot logical fallacies in arguments, there are several tips that can be helpful. First, it is important to use critical thinking skills to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of arguments. This involves being aware of flawed arguments and being able to identify logical fallacies. Second, understanding fallacy taxonomy can be useful in recognizing different types of fallacious arguments, such as fallacy by manipulating through language, fallacy by manipulating through emotion appeal, fallacy by manipulating through distraction, and inductive fallacy through inconsistencies and contradictions. Finally, employing a framework strategy to spot fallacious arguments, such as the three-stage evaluation framework proposed by Sourati et al., can provide a practical approach to identifying logical fallacies. By following these tips, individuals can become more adept at recognizing and addressing logical fallacies in everyday life and language teaching and learning.
What is the definition of argument?5 answersThe definition of argument is a central concept in logic and critical thinking. Different perspectives exist on how to define an argument, but many current proposals are considered inadequate. Some definitions interpret an argument as providing a definition of 'argument' simpliciter, while others interpret it as providing a definition of 'argument-for-S', where S is some agent or group of agents. However, these interpretations are objectionable regardless of the route taken. A proposal is made for an absolutist definition of 'argument' that avoids the problems discussed earlier. This definition sees an argument as a set of sentences or propositions, with one claimed to follow from the others. Additionally, argumentation is a process of discussion and debate aimed at uncovering information and understanding. Arguments can be constructed using a labelled deductive system and can be aggregated using various flattening functions. This approach sheds light on the logical structure of different uncertainty calculi.
What is argument?5 answersArgument is a fundamental aspect of human communication and sociality, involving the practice of making and criticizing reasons in the context of doubt and disagreement. Traditionally, argumentation has been conceptualized as a process of linguistic acts, where words and sentences are the building blocks of arguments. However, recent theories propose that argumentation can also involve non-verbal phenomena such as pictures, diagrams, and other sensory experiences. Argumentation is the process of constructing arguments about propositions and assigning statements of confidence based on the strength of supporting arguments. It is a process of discussion and debate aimed at uncovering information and understanding. Defining argument has been a topic of debate, with various proposals being criticized for their lack of precision. In summary, argument is a complex and multifaceted practice that involves the exchange of reasons and the evaluation of evidence in order to reach understanding and make informed decisions.
What is Counter argument?5 answersA counter argument is an argument that opposes or challenges the main point or conclusion of an argument. It involves conjoining the criticized argument with a critical argument to form a single argumentation. Counter arguments can be generated through various methods such as argument construction, retrieval, synthesis, and summarization. Effective counter argument generation requires explicitly modeling the conclusion of the argument and ensuring that the stance of the generated counter is opposite to that conclusion. In addition to rebutting the conclusion, counter arguments can also undermine an argument by attacking its premises. Identifying weak premises is crucial in generating effective counter arguments. By considering the strength of premises and targeting the weak ones, counter arguments can be generated that are relevant and adhere to the opposing stance.