What is the limit of detection of OPA assay?
Best insight from top research papers
The limit of detection of the OPA assay can be improved significantly by microwave-enhanced hydrolysis and subsequent post-column OPA derivatization. Compared to native fluorescence detection, the detection limit can be lowered by a factor between 60 and 120 depending on the amino acid composition of the protein .
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The provided paper does not mention the OPA assay or its limit of detection. The paper discusses the limitations of water quality control methods and the use of the detection limit to censor data. | |
| The paper does not mention the limit of detection of OPA assay. The paper is about optimizing proximity ligation assay (PLA) in Western blotting (WB) to lower the limit of detection. | |
31 Jan 2008 1 Citations | The provided paper does not mention anything about the limit of detection of OPA assay. |
109 Citations | The provided paper does not mention the OPA assay or its limit of detection. |
Related Questions
Whats the detection limit of TEM10 answersThe detection limit of Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) is a multifaceted concept that depends on various factors including the electron dosage, the efficiency of electron detectors, and the specific analytical techniques employed. High-resolution TEM studies are often constrained by the electron dosage, with sensitive samples such as catalysts and macromolecules only preserving their structures below a threshold of 100 ē/Å^2 due to the detrimental effects of high radiation doses. The efficiency of electron detectors plays a crucial role, as advancements in electron sources and optics have highlighted the limitations of current detection systems, pushing the need for novel sensor technologies that offer improved Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and Detective Quantum Efficiency (DQE).
Analytical techniques within TEM, such as Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) and Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS), have their own detection limits. EELS is more sensitive for light elements, while EDS is better suited for heavy elements, with the detection efficiency of EDS significantly improved by new detector technology. Diagnostic negative staining electron microscopy, a technique used for pathogen detection, has shown detection limits of 10^6 particles per ml using direct adsorption and can be improved to 10^5 particles per ml for spores and 5 × 10^4 particles per ml for poxviruses with airfuge ultracentrifugation.
Furthermore, the detection limit is also influenced by the method of sample preparation and analysis, with arbitrary detection limits potentially misstating the "true" detection limits. The concept of randomly exposing areas of the specimen to the electron beam to mitigate damage introduces challenges in immediate qualitative analysis due to the difficulty in interpreting subsampled images. Lastly, the effect of chromatic aberrations and the choice of using energy-filtered electrons can impact the detection limit, especially in the context of dark field microscopy of unstained specimens.
In summary, the detection limit of TEM is not a fixed value but varies with the specific conditions of the experiment, including the type of sample, the analytical technique used, and the efficiency of the detection system.
Whats the detection limit of NANOPARTICLES TEM9 answersThe detection limit of nanoparticles using various techniques varies significantly depending on the method and conditions employed. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) has been highlighted as a sensitive method for measuring nanoparticle dispersions in solutions, potentially more sensitive than dynamic light scattering for counting individual nanoparticles, including those in agglomerates. However, the specific detection limit for TEM was not directly provided in the contexts, but insights from related nanoparticle detection technologies can offer a comparative perspective.
For instance, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), a technique related to TEM in its use of electron beams for imaging, has demonstrated a size measurement limit for nano gold particles between 10 nm to 20 nm under certain conditions. This suggests that TEM, with its higher resolution compared to SEM, could potentially achieve a similar or better detection limit under optimal conditions.
Interferometric techniques have been developed to detect particles smaller than 20 nm by amplifying the particle signal without amplifying the background speckle, indicating the potential for high sensitivity in nanoparticle detection. Surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRM) allows for the real-time detection of nano- and micro-particles, with a detection limit for aqueous samples potentially below 1000 particles per microliter. Nanomechanical sensing techniques have achieved detection limits in the order of tens of femtograms to single attograms, enabling the detection of liquid volumes down to the zeptoliter scale.
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) has faced challenges in detecting particles below 10 nm due to sensitivity limitations. Magnetic nanoparticles-aided microwave imaging has shown the potential to detect amounts of magnetic nanoparticles between 2 and 7 mg dispersed in a volume of about one cubic centimeter. While these methods vary in their approach and application, they collectively underscore the ongoing advancements in nanoparticle detection technologies, suggesting that TEM, with its high-resolution capabilities, could potentially offer a competitive detection limit, especially when optimized for nanoparticle imaging.
What are the limitations of the Bradford Assay?5 answersThe limitations of the Bradford Assay include susceptibility to interference from nonprotein sources, such as chemicals and detergents, which can affect the accuracy of protein quantification. Foaming during mixing operations can also cause unintended light scattering and interfere with spectrometric sample analysis. Additionally, the standard technique requires larger volumes of protein samples, whereas a new protocol using an opto-microfluidic platform allows quantification using smaller volumes, resulting in a lower limit of quantification. The lysis buffer used for dissolving proteins can introduce interference and affect the protein-dye chromogenic process. However, increasing the phosphoric acid content in the dye reagent can reduce interference from the lysis buffer and improve sensitivity to proteins.
What is the limit of detection for KRAS mutations using cold PCR?4 answersThe limit of detection for KRAS mutations using cold PCR varies depending on the specific technique used. One study utilized a highly multiplexed dPCR technique combined with melting curve analysis and achieved a limit of detection of less than 0.2% for all target mutations. Another study used a modified oligonucleotide with phosphoryl guanidine (PG) groups as primers and blockers in allele-specific PCR and achieved a KRAS mutation detection limit of 20 copies of mutant DNA in a proportion as low as 0.1% of the total DNA. Additionally, a study using CRISPR-Cas12a demonstrated the ability to specifically detect 0.01% mutant KRAS DNA in the presence of wild-type DNA. Therefore, the limit of detection for KRAS mutations using cold PCR can range from less than 0.2% to as low as 0.01%, depending on the specific technique employed.
What are the limitations of immunoassays in drug screening?5 answersImmunoassays have limitations in drug screening, including variable cross-reactivity, false negatives, and false positives. These limitations can affect the sensitivity and specificity of the tests, leading to potential inaccuracies in results. Immunoassays may fail to detect certain drugs, such as benzodiazepines, as shown by liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Additionally, immunoassays used for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants can have significant cross-reactivity with metabolites, resulting in interference and positive bias in drug concentration measurements. It is important to be cautious when interpreting immunoassay drug screens and to consider the limitations associated with these screening procedures. Mass spectrometry analysis is often required to definitively identify and confirm drugs of abuse, but it may not be readily available.
What is the limit of detection for the biotin detection method?3 answersThe limit of detection for the biotin detection method is 0.03 nM.