What is the most efficient way to calculate shapely values?
Best insight from top research papers
The most efficient way to calculate shapely values is by using the energy equal partitioning method developed by Yen and Chien . This method divides the solid angles of a radiating source in a way that ensures equal energy carried by the beams within each small range of the solid angle. By examining the fraction of energy beams arriving at the wall surface, the shape factor can be obtained. The shape factor obtained by this method is better than that obtained by the Monte Carlo method in terms of convergence rate and computing time. Additionally, the influence of geometric configuration on the accuracy of the shape factor is investigated. The resulting shape factors satisfy the reciprocity law and energy conservation law, and are found to be closer to the exact shape factors .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
Open access•Journal Article | The provided paper does not discuss the calculation of shapely values. The paper focuses on type checking and weak type inference for polynomial size analysis of first-order functions. |
Open access 01 Jan 2011 | The provided paper does not discuss the calculation of shapely values. The paper is about rules in schemas and their application to shapes in art and design. |
| The provided paper does not discuss the calculation of Shapely values. It focuses on the calculation of shape factors using the energy equal partitioning method. | |
| The provided paper does not discuss the calculation of shapely values. The paper is about shape representation using metric interpolation. | |
| The provided paper is about shape analysis using fractal dimension, and it does not discuss the calculation of shapely values. |
Related Questions
What optimization method more efficient than DYCORS?5 answersThe optimization method proposed by Arnold et al. for synthesizing desired channels in a reconfigurable over-the-air chamber (ROTAC) using a two-step algorithm is more efficient than DYCORS. This method involves optimizing a linearized ROTAC model first and then refining the reconfigurable reflector states through gradient ascent optimization, demonstrating effectiveness in power angular spectrum synthesis. Additionally, He et al. introduce an efficient optimization method for compilation optimization problems, enhancing evolution efficiency and algorithm operation efficiency. Furthermore, Hallal et al. present a new hybrid conjugate gradient algorithm that is globally convergent and robust for solving unconstrained optimization problems, showcasing efficiency in numerical results. These methods offer advancements in optimization efficiency beyond DYCORS.
How to calculate Value at Risk?4 answersValue at Risk (VaR) can be calculated using various methods. One common approach is the variation-covariance method, which assumes that stock data is normally distributed. Another method is the Monte Carlo simulation, where random numbers are generated to estimate volatilities and simulate portfolio losses. The Quasi Monte Carlo method, which uses Halton's quasi-random sequences, has been found to produce a greater maximum loss compared to the Monte Carlo method in estimating portfolio losses in stocks. Additionally, a non-parametric estimation approach using spline interpolation has been proposed, which represents the empirical probability distribution of the return series. This method has shown to outperform other distribution-based models in estimating VaR. Overall, the choice of method depends on the specific requirements and characteristics of the portfolio being analyzed.
Calculator is for?4 answersA calculator is a programmable electronic device that allows for numerical evaluation of mathematical problems. It can perform basic mathematical operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, as well as more complex operations involving logical objects. The calculator has a user-interface centered around a last in first out stack of objects, which is visible and accessible to the user. Different types of objects can be entered into the calculator, each characterized by specific logical or mathematical rules. The calculator provides operations that can be applied uniformly to these objects, affecting their internal composition or their external positions on the stack. It also allows for the creation of new objects dynamically through calculator operations.
What is the most efficient way to calculate shapley values?5 answersThe most efficient way to calculate Shapley values is through an amortized model that directly predicts each input feature's Shapley Value without additional model evaluations. This model is trained on a set of examples whose Shapley Values are estimated from a large number of model evaluations to ensure stability. Experimental results demonstrate that this amortized model accurately estimates Shapley Values with up to 60 times speedup compared to traditional methods. Another efficient method is a sampling algorithm based on a multilinear extension technique, which provides more accurate estimations of Shapley values by reducing the variance of the sampling statistics. These methods offer computational efficiency while still providing accurate estimations of Shapley values.
How can we efficiently compute point cloud skeletons?5 answersEfficient computation of point cloud skeletons can be achieved through various methods. One approach is to use a Skeleton-Detail Transformer network that leverages cross-attention and self-attention layers to explore the correlation between local patterns and the global shape. Another method involves using the insights of the medial axis transform (MAT) to capture the intrinsic geometric and topological nature of the input points. This approach predicts a set of skeletal points through a geometric transformation and analyzes their connectivity to form skeletal mesh structures. These methods have been shown to have superior performance and robustness, and their learned skeletal representations can benefit tasks such as surface reconstruction and segmentation.
How to calculate MVA?2 answersMVA can be calculated using different methods depending on the context. In the case of OTC derivatives, MVA can be defined as the liability-side discounted expected margin profile. Another approach involves using an extended partial differential equation to derive an all-in fair value, which can be decomposed into coherent CVA, FVA, and MVA components. For pricing equity derivatives with CVA, a marked branching diffusion algorithm can be used, which includes stochastic interest rate models. In the field of echocardiography, the mitral valve area (MVA) can be assessed using a simple echo-Doppler method that takes into account the mitral flow volume, transmitral mean flow velocity, and diastolic filling time. For large-scale capacitance calculations, an integral equation formulation with a new representation for charge distributions can be used, resulting in a significant reduction in problem size and faster computation of the capacitance matrix.