What are the statement of the problems in research on the role of organizational culture on employee performance?5 answersThe research on the role of organizational culture on employee performance addresses several key problem statements. Firstly, it emphasizes the need to adapt to rapid changes in the organizational environment, where diversity plays a significant role. Secondly, it highlights the importance of analyzing how organizational culture influences employee performance, with a focus on factors like organizational commitment. Additionally, the research underscores the necessity of enhancing human resources through improvements in organizational culture and job satisfaction to achieve optimal employee performance. Furthermore, it points out the significance of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) as a moderating variable in improving organizational performance and culture, suggesting the fostering of a positive organizational culture through OCB practices.
What is the problem with organizational culture on how to measure outcomes?10 answersThe measurement of organizational culture and its impact on outcomes presents several challenges, as evidenced by the diverse methodologies and findings across recent research. One primary issue is the reliance on self-report methods, such as surveys, which are susceptible to reporting biases and sampling limitations. This concern is highlighted by the exploration of unobtrusive indicators of culture (UICs) as a supplementary methodology, although the application of multiple UICs from different data sources has yet to be fully explored and presents its own set of challenges, including the clustering of UICs by data source, reflecting the values and practices of different stakeholders rather than a cohesive organizational culture.
Further complicating the measurement of organizational culture is the conflicting data regarding the psychometric properties of widely used instruments, such as the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI), which has shown mixed evidence regarding its factor structure and criterion validity. Similarly, the Competing Values Framework (CVF), while popular, has demonstrated problems with applying conventional subscales to non-supervisors, indicating poor divergent properties and suggesting the need for reassessment of psychometric properties in each new context.
Moreover, the development and validation of culture effectiveness surveys face key challenges, including confirmatory testing of nested models, guidelines for aggregating data to the organizational level, and establishing criterion-related validity. Interestingly, some studies have found counterintuitive results, such as organizations perceived to have bad culture and climate yielding superior client outcomes, further complicating the understanding of culture's impact on outcomes.
The reliability and validity of instruments measuring organizational constructs in healthcare also remain sparse, underscoring the need for more robust measurement tools. Additionally, the influence of organizational culture on health outcomes, such as early mortality and loss to follow-up among patients enrolled for HIV care, suggests that clinical guidelines alone are insufficient without considering the organizational culture. This is echoed in surgical outcomes, where the skills and volumes of surgeons, influenced by organizational culture, significantly impact patient outcomes.
Efforts to improve organizational culture through surveys and feedback mechanisms have shown varied engagement and impact across units, with no clear relationship between survey scores and subsequent activities. Lastly, the effect of organizational culture on health outcomes post-discharge further emphasizes the complex relationship between culture and patient care, necessitating a deeper understanding of how organizational values influence outcomes.
In summary, the measurement of organizational culture and its impact on outcomes is fraught with methodological challenges, including the validity and reliability of measurement instruments, the influence of diverse stakeholder values, and the complex relationship between culture and outcomes. These issues underscore the need for further research and methodological innovation in this field.
How do organisational cultures shape the practices and outcomes of development?5 answersOrganizational cultures play a crucial role in shaping the practices and outcomes of development initiatives. A healthy workplace culture is essential for sustainable development, as it guides behaviors and interactions within organizations, impacting motivation and talent utilization. Different organizational cultures, such as clan culture, can significantly influence the effectiveness of development strategies, with a friendly environment and leader as a teacher being key characteristics. Understanding the fit between organizational culture and Agile practices is vital for effective software development outcomes, as organizations can select Agile practices that align with their cultural type without necessarily changing their existing culture. Organizational culture not only influences behaviors and actions within the organization but also impacts values, attitudes, and expectations, ultimately affecting the real actions of individuals and organizational success.
What are the most widely used academic references for measuring organizational culture?4 answersThe academic references widely used for measuring organizational culture include seminal works such as Peters and Waterman's "In Search of Excellence," Ouchi's "Theory Z," Deal and Kennedy's "Corporate Cultures," and Schein's "Organizational Culture and Leadership". Additionally, the book "Measuring Culture" provides insights into how cultural meanings influence organizations and how these influences can be measured qualitatively or quantitatively. Furthermore, recent research has explored unobtrusive indicators of culture (UICs) drawn from various data sources like social media, company reports, and executive data, as a supplementary methodology for identifying organizations at risk of failure. This evolving approach aims to capture the nuances of organizational culture through diverse analyses and data sources, reflecting a shift towards more comprehensive and data-driven measurement techniques.
What are the best ways to measure culture in an organization?5 answersMeasuring culture in an organization can be done using various methods. One approach is the use of self-report methods such as surveys. These methods involve engaging employees and collecting their feedback on the values and practices within the organization. Another method is the use of unobtrusive indicators of culture (UICs) drawn from different data sources such as social media, company reports, and executive data. These UICs provide a single measure of organizational culture without directly involving employees. Researchers have also developed quantitative values-based tools for assessing organizational culture, such as the Competing Values Framework and the Organizational Culture Inventory®. These tools categorize organizations into predefined archetypes or explore the presence and relative strength of specific cultural traits. Additionally, advancements in computational power and the availability of digital data have led to innovative approaches for measuring organizational culture. These approaches aim to increase construct validity and accessibility to relevant data while reducing biases.
How we deal with cross- cultural measurement issues?5 answersCross-cultural measurement issues can be addressed through various techniques and considerations. First, it is important to carefully evaluate the criteria used to measure cross-cultural performance, including criterion conceptualization, rater source, standardization, retrospective versus in-situ ratings, and rater usability. Additionally, establishing construct validity and measurement invariance beyond linguistic equivalence is crucial in cross-cultural research. Culturally validated instruments are necessary to accurately measure health-related concepts and outcomes in culturally diverse populations. The Culture, Comprehension, and Translation Bias (CCT) procedure can help detect the source of noninvariance in cross-cultural measurement, distinguishing between translation bias, culture bias, and comprehension bias. Finally, comparing arithmetic means versus latent mean comparisons can reduce measurement non-invariance and potential bias in cross-cultural research. By considering these techniques and issues, researchers can improve the reliability and validity of cross-cultural measurements.