What paper claims to refute the Carroll-Chen cosmological model?
Best insight from top research papers
The paper by Weaver claims to refute the Carroll-Chen cosmological model .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
Papers (5) | Insight |
---|---|
Open access•Journal Article 10 Citations | The provided paper does not mention the Carroll-Chen cosmological model. |
Open access•Posted Content | The provided paper does not mention the Carroll-Chen cosmological model. |
3 Citations | The paper does not explicitly claim to refute the Carroll-Chen cosmological model. |
The provided paper does not mention anything about refuting the Carroll-Chen cosmological model. | |
Open access•Posted Content | The provided paper claims to refute the Carroll-Chen cosmological model. |
Related Questions
What are the main points of the paper?5 answersThe main points of the papers are as follows: KP-DNN testing and validation is a challenging problem due to the prediction of many independent key-points and the variation in images. Legal requirements and technical standards for domestic wastewater treatment plants are discussed, highlighting the limitations and the need for improvement. The concept of "non-legal rules" is explored, examining when rules become non-legal and the difficulties they pose for law enforcement officials. The Polish Compensation Act is critically analyzed, revealing its shortcomings and suggesting improvements to benefit victims of crimes.
List the theories used in the paper?4 answersThe papers do not mention any specific theories used in their research.
What is this paper saying: Mak, T. C., Chan, D. K.,?5 answersThe paper by Mak, T. C. and Chan, D. K. proposes a slightly enhanced closed-form expression for estimating the modal correlation coefficients of wind-excited structures needed for complete quadratic combination (CQC) of response in various modes. The authors extend the expression proposed in Chen and Kareem 2005 and emphasize the need for a modified CQC scheme for wind-excited structures. They suggest including the quad-spectrum, i.e., the imaginary part of the cross power spectral density function, to improve the estimate of modal response correlation. The paper compares three different schemes for calculating the modal correlation coefficients and their influence on the predictions of building accelerations using the CQC rule. The study highlights the implications of the modified CQC scheme and its importance in accurately predicting the response of wind-excited structures.
What is the criticism about the appraisal model by Martin and White?5 answersThe criticism about the appraisal model by Martin and White is that it fails to clearly separate the antecedent, appraisal, from the consequent, emotion. Additionally, the available evidence does not show a clear causal relationship between appraisals and emotions, as appraisals can be both consequences and antecedents of emotions. Furthermore, emotion elicitation depends not only on appraisal but also on prevailing emotional response tendencies and direct stimulus effects. The relationship between appraisals and emotions is not as straightforward as the appraisal model suggests. To fully evaluate the role of appraisal in emotion elicitation, it is necessary to extend the range of dependent variables used in this context.
What is the argument from this paper?3 answersThe argument from Burkholder's paper is focused on the analysis of philosophical arguments and the transferability of argument analysis skills beyond philosophy. Lonsway's paper explores the impact of the architectural-computational 'argument' on design practices and proposes a post-structuralist computer as a challenge to contemporary computational work in architecture. Gaskin's paper presents a general argument for linguistic idealism, discussing the relationship between language and the structure of the world. Poston's paper offers a Bayesian model for evaluating the strength of evidence in cases with multiple independent pieces of evidence, specifically applying it to assess the strength of arguments for theism. Wilcox's paper argues in favor of the principle of indifference, providing a novel argument based on an intuition about confidence in outcomes and contrasting it with the wide interval view.
Can you show me this paper? Wang, F., Wang, M., Zheng, Y., Jin, J.,?3 answersWang, F., Wang, M., Zheng, Y., and Jin, J. are not mentioned in any of the provided abstracts.