What role of universities in co-production of public policy/service in the United States? 

Universities play a pivotal role in the co-production of public policy and service in the United States, serving as crucial bridges between academic research, policy formulation, and societal needs. This multifaceted involvement is increasingly recognized as essential in addressing contemporary challenges through collaborative efforts that leverage academic expertise, policy-making processes, and community engagement. The co-production of research between policy and academia, facilitated by embedding researchers within organizations, exemplifies a strategic approach to developing shared agendas and overcoming barriers to utilizing research in policy and practice. This method ensures that academic insights directly inform policy development, fostering meaningful impacts and bridging the gap between academic and policy contexts . Furthermore, the evolving dynamics between universities and the state, underpinned by the global knowledge economy, underscore the importance of universities in policy analysis and the reconfiguration of their interactions with governmental bodies. This relationship is critical for understanding and navigating the complexities of higher education's role in public policy . The concept of co-production, particularly in health, social care, and higher education, highlights the importance of integrating the skills and experiences of service users with professional knowledge. Universities, by adopting co-production frameworks, can significantly enhance service user experiences and contribute to more equitable and effective public services . However, despite the potential benefits, co-production in public policy remains underdeveloped and often conceptually vague, necessitating a more robust theoretical foundation to guide its implementation and ensure its effectiveness in public service reform . Universities' engagement in co-production processes extends beyond academic and policy realms, involving citizens and public service agents in the provision of public services. This collaborative approach not only enriches the research and policy landscape but also empowers communities and fosters active citizenship . The challenge of influencing policymaking in higher education, however, requires a reconsideration of the interactions between academic researchers and policymakers. By fostering long-term relationships and collaborations, universities can co-create policy knowledge, moving beyond the traditional 'expert' model towards a more inclusive and applied research approach that addresses real-world problems . Operationalizing co-production through service blueprinting in higher education, for instance, demonstrates how universities can actively engage staff and students in improving service delivery and student experiences. This practical application of co-production principles underscores the potential for universities to contribute significantly to public service enhancement . The broader interface between universities and society, emphasized by concepts such as the 'triple helix of industry, government, and university,' further highlights the critical role of universities in fostering innovation and competitive advantage through learning and knowledge-generation processes . Public administration, as a field that encompasses both theoretical richness and practical application, offers a framework for enacting student engagement and co-creation principles in public services. This approach aligns with the ideals of students-as-partners and underscores the potential for universities to actively contribute to the co-production of public services . Finally, the involvement of users in the co-production of public services, facilitated by universities, addresses fiscal pressures on public spending by leveraging academic expertise and community engagement to deliver more efficient and effective public services . In summary, universities in the United States play a critical role in the co-production of public policy and service, acting as catalysts for innovation, collaboration, and societal advancement through their unique position at the intersection of academia, policy-making, and community engagement.

Co-production under the Financial Crisis and Austerity : a means of democratizing Public Services or a race to the bottom?

Not addressed in the paper.

Academia and Public Policy: Towards the co-generation of knowledge and learning processes

Not addressed in the paper.

Building student engagement through co-production and curriculum co-design in public administration programmes:

Not addressed in the paper.

Operationalizing co-production in public services delivery

Not addressed in the paper.

Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence:

Not addressed in the paper.

Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment?

Not addressed in the paper.

Co-creating policy knowledge

Not addressed in the paper.

Co-production: what it is and how it can ensure inclusive practice for service users and staff.

Not addressed in the paper.

Co-producing policy relevant research

Not addressed in the paper.

Public Policy and Universities

Not addressed in the paper.