Who were the actors or key organisations that shaped up the cocaine drug policy in the Australian context?
Best insight from top research papers
The shaping of cocaine drug policy in Australia involved various actors and organizations. The Australian National Council on Drugs (ANCD) played a significant role in the drug policy community, introduced in 1997 as part of the "Tough on Drugs" policy initiative by the Howard conservative government . Additionally, non-government organizations (NGOs) like Australia21 have actively engaged in the drug policy debate, advocating for a shift away from prohibition-based approaches . Moreover, the study by Shearer et al. highlighted the role of cocaine dealers in the Australian market, emphasizing the challenges in disrupting private social networks involved in cocaine transactions . These actors, including governmental bodies like the ANCD, NGOs like Australia21, and cocaine dealers, collectively influenced and shaped the landscape of cocaine drug policy in Australia.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
16 Citations | The Australian National Council on Drugs (ANCD) and the Ministerial Council on Drug Strategy (MCDS) played key roles in shaping the cocaine drug policy in Australia. |
| Law enforcement efforts at the border and beyond are crucial in shaping Australian cocaine drug policy due to the large-scale importations supporting the market, as highlighted in the research. | |
Open access•Dissertation 01 Jan 2014 | Not addressed in the paper. |
2 Citations | Australia21, civil society agencies, and the Global Commission Report influenced the shift in Australian drug policy towards abandoning prohibition-based approaches and promoting wider discussions. |
01 Jan 2017 14 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
Related Questions
What are the economic benefits of government or organizational actions towards addicton?4 answersGovernment and organizational actions towards addiction can yield significant economic benefits. By investing in substance abuse treatment interventions, governments can reduce costs associated with health care, criminal justice resources, loss of productivity, and premature mortality. Evaluating the efficiency of health promotion policies related to addictive substances like alcohol and tobacco can lead to improvements in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and overall well-being. Additionally, government expenditure on combating drug abuse prevalence and rehabilitating drug addicts can have a positive impact on the real growth rate of the economy. Implementing cost-effective addiction treatments can result in economic benefits, especially through reductions in criminal activity costs, which can be a significant component of the overall benefits.
What drug influenced is for drug abuse?4 answersDrug abuse is influenced by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Genetic risk factors, such as a family history of drug abuse, criminal activity, and psychiatric issues, play a significant role. Environmental risk factors, including adoptive parental history of divorce, death, criminal activity, and alcohol problems, also contribute to the risk of drug abuse. Additionally, peer influence and inadequate parental or guardian care are prevalent influencing factors in youth drug abuse. Different classes of drugs, such as stimulants like cocaine and depressants like ethanol, target various neurotransmitter systems in the brain, leading to stimulating, depressing, or disturbing effects on brain activity. Understanding these genetic, environmental, and pharmacological influences is crucial in addressing and preventing drug abuse issues among individuals, especially the youth.
What are the specific age groups that are most affected by substance abuse in australia?4 answersThe specific age groups that are most affected by substance abuse in Australia are as follows:
- The 55-90-year-old age group has a higher prevalence rate of substance abuse, with males having a higher rate than females. Being a non-baby boomer is a protective factor against substance abuse in this age group.- The >=70-year-old age group has a higher proportion of daily alcohol drinkers, with 21% of men and 10% of women in this age group consuming alcohol daily.- Among young people aged 12-17, alcohol is the most commonly used substance, with 22.6% reporting alcohol consumption in the past week. Tobacco use is also prevalent, with 12.1% of 14-19 year olds having used tobacco. Marijuana use is reported by 18.0-22.1% of this age group.- Early adolescents aged 13-15 are more likely to use alcohol and cannabis compared to older youth, and less likely to use heroin. They are also less likely to be homeless or have been incarcerated, but more likely to have committed property crime and begged.- People aged 18-34 are three times more likely to have an alcohol use disorder than those aged 55 and over. A significant proportion of those with alcohol and drug use disorders have consulted a health professional in the past 12 months.
To what extent has the war on drugs been influenced by racism?4 answersThe war on drugs has been influenced by racism to a significant extent. Racist logics shape policy deliberation and limit access to narcotic drug epidemics, leading to disparate policy outcomes along racial lines. Structural and institutional racism are prevalent in harm reduction (HR) services, with color-blind policies and practices failing to address the intersectional nature of the drug policy crisis. The enduring environment of a structurally racist drug criminalization agenda continues to permeate and constrict attempts at change, undermining public health-oriented policy reforms. The narrow parameters, police discretion, and competing laws further criminalize people who use illicit drugs, disadvantaging Black and Hispanic/Latino communities. These findings highlight the need for critical reflection and action to create more equitable, inclusive, and accessible spaces for all people who use drugs.
How do policies support families who use drugs?5 answersPolicies support families who use drugs by emphasizing the importance of family support in the recovery process and advocating for changes in child welfare interventions. These policies recognize that the assumption that any amount of drug use by a parent places a child in imminent danger is not supported by scientific evidence. They highlight the role of the family as a good role model, educator on drug abuse prevention, mentor, and community partner in preventing drug abuse and supporting recovery. Additionally, policies recommend changes in practice and policy to address child to parent abuse, which is often overlooked in current frameworks. The family's role in helping drug users recover is crucial, and support provided by the family, such as assessment, instrumental, informational, and social support, can make the recovery process more effective. These policies aim to ensure that family support services are able to address the needs of family members affected by a loved one's drug problem.
How did the cocaine trade influence the regime in colombia?5 answersThe cocaine trade in Colombia has had a significant influence on the regime in the country. The drug trade has led to radical changes in Colombia's economy, society, politics, and culture, contributing to the remaking of the country's entire national structure. The violence associated with the drug trade has affected the country to an unprecedented degree, leading to the destruction of the judicial system, growing corruption, and the penetration of various institutions by drug traffickers. The production and trafficking of cocaine have fueled the Colombian civil conflict, with areas experiencing accelerated coca production becoming more violent, particularly in regions with a pre-existing guerilla presence. The cocaine market in Colombia operates as an imperfect competitive and vertically integrated structure, with farmers, insurgent groups, and cocaine traffickers all playing distinct roles. The cocaine trade is not just a criminal activity but also a vital aspect of U.S. imperialism in the Colombian economic system, contributing to the re-colonization of Colombia and the accumulation of capital by the narcobourgeoisie.