scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Why should cultural sovereignty weigh more than biodiversity conservation? 


Best insight from top research papers

Cultural sovereignty should weigh more than biodiversity conservation because indigenous communities and local knowledge systems play a significant role in preserving natural resources . The International Convention on Biological Diversity recognizes the importance of local knowledge systems embedded in traditional lifestyles for in situ conservation of biodiversity . Indigenous environmental knowledge is a social product integral to cultural systems and is closely tied to subsistence activities and ritual practices that define indigenous perceptions of the environment . The relatedness of culture and nature in indigenous cultures provides a foundation for effective conservation measures . Additionally, the maintenance of 'biocultural diversity' rather than just biodiversity should be the measure of conservational success, as biological conservation and cultural and linguistic conservation are intimately linked . Therefore, prioritizing cultural sovereignty ensures that conservation initiatives are responsive to the needs and perspectives of indigenous communities .

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
The answer to the query is not present in the provided paper. The paper discusses the need for biocultural approaches to conservation and highlights the different perspectives on policy and practice between indigenous peoples and national/international visions of sustainable futures in the Amazon. However, it does not explicitly address why cultural sovereignty should weigh more than biodiversity conservation.
The provided paper does not explicitly state that cultural sovereignty should weigh more than biodiversity conservation.
The paper does not explicitly state that cultural sovereignty should weigh more than biodiversity conservation.
Open accessBook ChapterDOI
Markku Oksanen, Timo Vuorisalo 
01 Jan 2019
1 Citations
The paper does not discuss why cultural sovereignty should weigh more than biodiversity conservation. The paper focuses on the concept of conservation sovereignty and its implications for biodiversity conservation.
The provided paper does not explicitly state that cultural sovereignty should weigh more than biodiversity conservation.

Related Questions

Why is conserving culture important.?5 answersConserving culture is crucial due to its significance in various aspects of society. Culture preservation not only safeguards historical traditions and values but also contributes to biodiversity conservation, sustainable development, and societal well-being. It plays a vital role in maintaining cultural heritage, promoting understanding among different communities, and fostering a sense of identity and belonging. Conservation efforts help protect sacred sites, rare species, and traditional practices, bridging the gap between cultural values and biodiversity conservation goals. Education and awareness about conservation culture are essential for ensuring the transmission of cultural heritage to future generations and fostering a sense of responsibility towards protecting it.
Types of state base on sovereignty?4 answersThere are three types of state based on sovereignty discussed in the abstracts. The first is the "Wilsonian imperium" which proposes a world governed by a transnational community of liberal citizens that would regulate state behavior. The second is the "Bolshevik imperium" which initially aimed for world revolution but eventually created a unique species of imperial state that resembled the Westphalian state. The third type is the successor state which is characterized by new and unstable foundations, focusing on maximizing and naturalizing ethnic and historical boundaries. Additionally, the concept of state sovereignty is explored in two competing understandings: a static understanding that regards sovereignty as absolute within the state territory, and a dynamic understanding that sees sovereignty as evolutionary and capable of taking different forms. These abstracts provide insights into the different types of state based on sovereignty and the challenges to the conventional understanding of state sovereignty in the modern world.
What are the implications of globalization for the assertion and exercise of national sovereignty?5 answersGlobalization has significant implications for the assertion and exercise of national sovereignty. The process of globalization, particularly the removal of trade and financial barriers between nations, has contributed to the fragility and weaknesses of small states like Lebanon, diminishing their sovereignty and prospects for an independent national political economy. Economic globalization has eroded the divide between national and international systems, leading to a mutual embedding of states and the global system. While states and their sovereignty are not disappearing, they are unable to exercise their agentive power as effectively as before. The effectiveness of sovereignty in a globalized world depends on cooperation and the ability to navigate the challenges posed by international order. Globalization itself is neither positive nor negative, but its consequences depend on how countries utilize its results for their development. The construction of national policy space becomes crucial in navigating the impact of globalization on democracy and national sovereignty.
How does culture mediate ecosystem services?4 answersCulture mediates ecosystem services by influencing people's perceptions and experiences of these services. Socio-demographic characteristics such as material wealth, gender, education, and age shape how people perceive and value ecosystem services, including cultural services provided by birds. Agroforests, as socioecological systems, provide cultural ecosystem services that enhance provisioning, supporting, and regulating ecosystem services. However, these cultural services are often overlooked in assessments due to their intangible nature. Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) play a crucial role in managing their landscapes and sustaining livelihoods, which in turn provide ecosystem services for the wider public. Understanding and acknowledging IPLCs' cultural practices and customs is essential for effective environmental policy decision-making. The means-end model and the concept of cultural ecosystem services help make sense of the cultural value of nature, although criticisms exist regarding the appropriateness of using the term "ecosystems" and attempts to price such services. People's benefits from cultural ecosystem services are influenced by social factors, engagement in nature-related activities, and the charisma and abundance of species groups in the local landscape.
How does colonialism impact biodiversity?5 answersColonialism impacts biodiversity by altering native species richness patterns and their adaptive capacity. In the case of ascidians, colonial species dominate at lower latitudes, particularly in the tropics and subtropics, due to their ability to regrow and adjust in shape and space to avoid predation. Additionally, range expansions under climate change favor generalist species over specialists, leading to increased population-level diet breadth. However, increased productivity, such as through nitrogen addition, can decrease species richness in grassland fields due to lower rates of species gain and higher rates of loss. Overall, colonialism can have both positive and negative effects on biodiversity, depending on the specific context and species involved.
What are the criteria used to determine which cultural landscapes are considered for conservation?5 answersCultural landscapes considered for conservation are determined based on several criteria. One criterion is the recognition of the interplay between people and nature, as well as the importance of traditional ecological knowledge and sense of place. Another criterion is the historical and cultural significance of the landscape, including its role in societal identity and way of life. The value of cultural heritage landscapes, both tangible and intangible, is also taken into account. Additionally, the ecological richness and biodiversity of the landscape are considered, with an emphasis on connecting past, present, and future to ensure its survival and prosperity. The guidance provided by heritage conservation doctrine and the creation of special regulations and designations by national governments and organizations also influence the selection of cultural landscapes for conservation. These criteria help in understanding, valuing, managing, and conserving cultural landscapes.