scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Fuzzy-trace theory published in 2005"


BookDOI
26 May 2005
TL;DR: Theoretical explanations of false memory can be found in this article, where the authors present a taxonomy of different types of false memories and their application in criminal investigation and psychotherapy.
Abstract: PREFACE PART I: BACKGROUND 1. Your Ancients 2. Varieties of False Memory: A Modern Taxonomy PART II: THE BASIC SCIENCE OF FALSE MEMORY 3. Theoretical Explanations of False Memory 4. Controlling False Memories with Opponent Processes 1: Laboratory Research with Adults 5. Controlling False Memories with Opponent Processes 2: Developmental Research with Children and Adolescents PART III: THE APPLIED SCIENCE OF FALSE MEMORY 6. False Memory in Criminal Investigation 1: Adult Interviewing and Eyewitness Identification 7. False Memory in Criminal Investigation 2: Child Interviewing and Testimony 8. False Memory in Psychotherapy PART IV: FUTURE DIRECTIONS 9. Some Growing Tips REFERENCES

527 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined coherence and correspondence criteria for rationality in experts' judgments of risk, and investigated biases in risk estimation for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) predicted by fuzzy trace theory.
Abstract: The aim of this study is to examine both coherence and correspondence criteria for rationality in experts' judgments of risk. We investigated biases in risk estimation for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) predicted by fuzzy-trace theory, i.e., that specific errors would occur despite experts' knowledge of correct responses. One hundred twenty professionals with specific knowledge of STI risks in adolescents were administered a survey questionnaire to test predictions concerning: knowledge deficits (producing underestimation of risks); gist-based representation of risk categories (producing overestimation of condom effectiveness); retrieval failure for risk knowledge (producing lower risk estimates); and processing interference in combining risk estimates (producing biases in post-test diagnosis of infection). Retrieval was manipulated by asking estimation questions that “unpacked” the STI category into infection types or did not specify infection types. Other questions differentiated processing biases from knowledge deficits or retrieval failure by directly providing requisite knowledge. Experts' knowledge of STI transmission and infection risks was verified empirically. Nevertheless, under predictable conditions, they misestimated risk, overestimated the effectiveness of condoms, and also suffered from processing biases. When questions provided better retrieval supports (unpacked format), risk estimates improved. Biases were linked to gist representations, retrieval failures, and processing errors, as opposed to knowledge about STIs. Results support fuzzy-trace theory's dual-process assumptions that different types of errors are dissociated from one another, and separate failures of coherence and correspondence among the same sample of experts. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

64 citations




Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article investigated the effect of the strength of both the gist and the verbatim information on false memories and found that false memories were more likely when weak verbatims occurred along with strong gist than only with weak gist encoding (as with rare words).
Abstract: Fuzzy Trace Theory argues that false memories arise from a weak verbatim memory along with strong encoding of the meaning (gist). The present study simultaneously investigated the effects of the strength of both the gist and the verbatim information on false memories. Exp. 1 was carried out to compare false memories for common and rare words in recall and recognition. In Exp. 2 a control for possible testing effects was added, and participants were given a recognition test with no preceding recall test. Qualitative judgements (Remember vs Know) regarding words judged as old on the recognition test were also collected in Exp. 2. Both experiments showed that false memories were more likely when weak verbatim items occurred along with strong gist (as with common words) than only with weak gist encoding (as with rare words). Moreover, participants were more likely to choose falsely physically similar distractors for rare words than for common words. Semantically similar distractors, on the other hand, were more likely to be selected for common than for rare words. These results provide further support for the fuzzy trace theory explanation of false memories. However, some weaknesses of this model regarding false memories are also discussed.

7 citations