scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Test theories of special relativity published in 2000"



Book
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the historical background of Special Relativity Theory and the empirical confirmation of special Relativity theory, and the Elimination of absolute time and Relativistic Time.
Abstract: Preface. 1. The Historical Background of Special Relativity. 2. Einstein's Special Theory. 3. Time Dilation and Length Contraction. 4. Empirical Confirmation of Special Relativity. 5. Two Relativistic Interpretations. 6. The Classical Concept of Time. 7. The Positivistic Foundations of Relativity Theory. 8. The Elimination of Absolute Time. 9. Absolute Time and Relativistic Time. 10. God, Time, and Relativity. 11. Conclusion. Bibliography. Subject Index. Proper Name Index.

75 citations


Posted Content
TL;DR: In this paper, a detailed comparison of the works of Lorentz and of Poincare up to 1904 is presented, showing that both authors succeeded in constructing a coherent and fully relativistic theory, although their ideas about the ether were radically different.
Abstract: Special relativity was discovered at the eve of the century, but finds its roots in the 19th century efforts to understand the optics and electromagnetism of moving bodies. These roots are reviewed in Parts 1 and 2, the latter being specially devoted to the works of Lorentz and of Poincare up to 1904. Part 3 contains a detailed comparison of the works of Einstein and of Poincare in 1905. It is shown that both authors succeeded in constructing a coherent and fully relativistic theory, although their ideas about the ether were radically different. In Part 4, the question of the respective merits of the three potential fathers of special relativity (i.e. Lorentz, Poincare, Einstein) is discussed again, at the light of the preceding analysis and of the "post-1905" developments of the theory.

42 citations



Book
10 Feb 2000
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an integrated treatment of classical mechanics and special relativity by treating classical mechanics as Galilean relativity, which gives students the freedom to formulate a particular problem in one frame of reference and solve it in another, where it takes a simpler form.
Abstract: Special relativity suffers from the myth that it is difficult In order to overcome this barrier Dynamics and relativity presents an integrated treatment of classical mechanics and special relativity, by treating classical mechanics as Galilean relativity This gives students the freedom to formulate a particular problem in one frame of reference and solve it in another, where it takes a simpler form This strategy, which is central to special relativity, is applied to problems in classical mechanics, thus preparing the tools and thought patterns for a treatment of special relativity

26 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a special Relativity with Acceleration (SRAD) model is proposed. But the model is not suitable for the special case of special geometry with acceleration (SRI).
Abstract: (2000). Special Relativity with Acceleration. The American Mathematical Monthly: Vol. 107, No. 3, pp. 219-237.

13 citations


Book
21 Jul 2000
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore and expound relativity physics and four-dimensional symmetry from the logically simplest viewpoint by making one single postulate instead of two, and indicate the simplest generalization of the Lorentz transformation in order to cope with frames with constant linear accelerations.
Abstract: The purposes of this book are (1) to explore and expound relativity physics and four-dimensional symmetry from the logically simplest viewpoint by making one single postulate instead of two; and (2) to indicate the simplest generalization of the Lorentz transformation in order to cope with frames with constant linear accelerations. The fundamentally new ideas of the first purpose are developed on the basis of the term paper of a Harvard physics undergraduate. They lead to an unexpected affirmative answer to the long-standing question of whether it is possible to construct a relativity theory without postulating the constancy of the speed of light and retaining only the first postulate of special relativity. This question was discussed in the early years following the discovery of special relativity by many physicists, including Ritz, Tolman, Kunz, Comstock and Pauli, all of whom obtained negative answers. Furthermore, the new theory of relativity indicates the truly universal and fundamental constants in physics, and provides a broad view of relativistic physics beyond special relativity. It substantiates the view and sheds light on the understanding that the four-dimensional symmetry framework can accommodate many different concepts of physical time, including common time and Reichenbach's general concept of time. This logically simplest viewpoint of relativity allows a natural extension of the physics of particles and fields from inertial frames to noninertial frames in which the speed of light is not constant. New predictions in physics resulting from this new viewpoint are discussed. The book is based on papers by the author and his collaborators in Physics Letters A, Nuovo Cimento B, and Physical Review A and D.

10 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the status of testing the principle of equivalence and Lorentz invariance from atmospheric and solar neutrino experiments is reviewed and a review of the results is given.
Abstract: We review the status of testing the principle of equivalence and Lorentz invariance from atmospheric and solar neutrino experiments.

10 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the main development of relativistic dynamics in the special theory of relativity is considered. But the focus is not on the kinematic part of the story as is usually done.
Abstract: In this paper I concentrate on the dynamic aspects of the special theory of relativity (in the non-Minkowski formalism), and not on the kinematic part of the story as is usually done. Following up the dynamic story leads to a new point of view as to Poincare's important role in the development of special relativity. Much of Poincare's dynamic work did not enter into Einstein's 1905 theory, since Einstein was mainly occupied with kinematics. However, the dynamic part is most fundamental in the development of the special theory of relativity after 1905. In this paper I consider the main developments of relativistic dynamics in which I demonstrate that much response to Poincare's dynamic research can be found. I argue that Poincare's dynamic work assisted in departing from Einstein's electrodynamic theory towards relativistic dynamics (independent of electrodynamics).

8 citations


Posted Content
21 Oct 2000
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that General Relativity with cosmological constant can be formulated as a constrained SO(D + 1)-Yang-Mills (YM) theory.
Abstract: General Relativity as a (constrained) Yang-Mills's theory. Abstract We show that General Relativity (GR) with cosmological constant can be formulated as a rather simple constrained SO(D + 1)-Yang-Mills (YM) theory. Furthermore, the spin connections of the Cartan-Einstein formulation for GR appear as solutions of a genuine SO(D)-YM. This work sets out to enforce the close connection between YM theories and GR by means of a new construction.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented the simplest proof that the general relativity principle does not come to the particular relativity principle in case of inertial motion in an empty space and showed that a violation of the particular principle occurs within the scope of the general relativistic principle.
Abstract: The present paper represents the simplest proof that the general relativity principle does not come to the particular relativity principle in case of inertial motion in an empty space It admits an existence of phenomena, where a violation of the particular relativity principle occurs within the scope of the general relativity principle Under modern development of experimental techniques, a search of such hypothetical phenomena can be made only by means of the Mossbauer effect A scheme of possible experiment has been proposed

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider the case of a plane electromagnetic wave travelling through a medium and point out that an observer moving with the wave would note some apparently curious properties, such as anomalous properties.
Abstract: We consider the case of a plane electromagnetic wave travelling through a medium and point out that an observer moving with the wave would note some apparently curious properties.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Special Theory of Relativity as discussed by the authors is a theory of electromagnetism that predicts the existence of electromagnetic waves which move at a speed c, which is a fundamental constant of nature.
Abstract: For centuries, physics was dominated by Newton's ideas about space, time and mechanics. These ideas led to a very successful description of the solar system. In the 1800s the theory of electromagnetism came into being with the work of Faraday, Maxwell and others. This theory predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves which move at a speed c, which is a fundamental constant of nature. This was not easy to understand using Newtonian ideas. From the resulting tension between Newtonian physics and electromagnetic theory was born the ‘Special Theory of Relativity’.

Posted Content
TL;DR: The E=mc^2 relationship is not unique to special relativity as discussed by the authors, and it is possible to derive an exact derivation from special relativity using a first-order Doppler equation instead of special relativity's "relativistic" formula.
Abstract: The E=mc^2 relationship is not unique to special relativity. Einstein published one exact derivation from special relativity and two approximate derivations that used general extensions to Newtonian mechanics, and an exact derivation is also possible if we use a "first-order" Doppler equation instead of special relativity's "relativistic Doppler" formula. We present two sample derivations based on different non-transverse Doppler relationships, and briefly look at the two diverging systems of physics that result.

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: From the early sixties a long-term scientific wave was initiated in the communities of the physical and mathematical disciplines as mentioned in this paper, which was described very well by the title of the survey book (1993) prepared for the 65th birthday of D Sciama: “The Renaissance of General Relativity and Cosmology”.
Abstract: From the early sixties a long-term scientific wave was initiated in the communities of the physical and mathematical disciplines It was described very well by the title of the survey book (1993) prepared for the 65th birthday of D Sciama: “The Renaissance of General Relativity and Cosmology” [1] Six years later one can see that in this area experimental and theoretical issues are still growing in quantity and quality and cross-fertilizing in a measure conceivable only in a very fortunate period of the evolution of a science

Book
01 Sep 2000
TL;DR: Einstein as a Youth The Michelson-Morley Experiment Special Relativity Four-Dimensional Space-Time and Time Travel General Relativity Gravity and Curved Space Time Testing the Theory Black Holes and Other Exotic Objects To the Ends of the Universe Searching for the Elusive Quantum Quandary Epilogue Index as mentioned in this paper
Abstract: Einstein as a Youth The Michelson-Morley Experiment Special Relativity Four-Dimensional Space-Time and Time Travel General Relativity Gravity and Curved Space-Time Testing the Theory Black Holes and Other Exotic Objects To the Ends of the Universe Searching for the Elusive Quantum Quandary Epilogue Index

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: A historical review of some aspects of string theory relevant to our present understanding of General Relativity and connected with Einstein's unification program is given in this article, with a focus on the unification program.
Abstract: We give a historical review of some aspects of string theory relevant to our present understanding of General Relativity and connected with Einstein’s unification program.



Posted Content
05 Jun 2000
TL;DR: In this article, a phenomenological explanation for the physics of aberration is presented, which is in contrast with special relativity physics, and it is demonstrated that the classical concepts of time and simultaneity are natural for describing relativistic phenomena.
Abstract: A phenomenological explanation is presented for the physics of aberration, which is in contrast with special relativity physics. The effect of relativity is identified with an effect due to the velocity of observation being affected by the velocity of a moving particle. In contrast with the currently accepted view, it is demonstrated that the classical concepts of time and simultaneity are natural for describing relativistic phenomena.