scispace - formally typeset
A

Aditya Khosla

Researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Publications -  62
Citations -  71575

Aditya Khosla is an academic researcher from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Object detection & Artificial neural network. The author has an hindex of 39, co-authored 61 publications receiving 50417 citations. Previous affiliations of Aditya Khosla include Stanford University & Open University of Catalonia.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings Article

Where are they looking

TL;DR: A deep neural network-based approach for gaze-following and a new benchmark dataset, GazeFollow, for thorough evaluation are proposed and it is shown that this approach produces reliable results, even when viewing only the back of the head.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamics of scene representations in the human brain revealed by magnetoencephalography and deep neural networks.

TL;DR: The data provide a first description of an electrophysiological signal for layout processing in humans, and suggest that deep neural networks are a promising framework to investigate how spatial layout representations emerge in the human brain.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

An integrated machine learning approach to stroke prediction

TL;DR: This study compares the Cox proportional hazards model with a machine learning approach for stroke prediction on the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) dataset and proposes a novel automatic feature selection algorithm that selects robust features based on the proposed heuristic: conservative mean.
Proceedings Article

Memorability of Image Regions

TL;DR: This work proposes a probabilistic framework that models how and which local regions from an image may be forgotten using a data-driven approach that combines local and global images features.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Modifying the Memorability of Face Photographs

TL;DR: It is shown that face photographs manipulated to be more memorable (or more forgettable) are indeed more often remembered (or forgotten) in a crowd-sourcing experiment with an accuracy of 74%.