Aleksi Räsänen

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a systematic review of 42 sub-national climate risk and vulnerability assessments using an analytical framework with which they evaluated the conceptual approaches to vulnerability and exposure used, if current or future risks were assessed, and if and how changes over time (i.e. dynamics) were considered.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors systematically reviewed current climate change literature in order to examine how multiple processes that affect human vulnerability have been studied and concluded that there are multiple interacting stressors, whose interlinkages need to be carefully analyzed and targeted by policies.

TL;DR: It is concluded that multiple different optical, topographical, and vegetation height datasets should be used when mapping vegetation in spatially heterogeneous landscapes, and that sub-meter resolution data (e.g. UAV or aerial) are necessary for the most accurate maps.

TL;DR: The relative fraction of uplands versus wetlands was key to determining the net regional C balance at this and other Arctic tundra sites because wetlands were hot spots for C cycling in Arctic tondra ecosystems.

TL;DR: This study tested different supervised segmentation evaluation measures and visual interpretation in the case of boreal forest habitat mapping in Southern Finland and found out that there is no straightforward answer to the argument, since the definition of good segmentation is inconsistent.