scispace - formally typeset
A

Alison Parkes

Researcher at University of Glasgow

Publications -  51
Citations -  2265

Alison Parkes is an academic researcher from University of Glasgow. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Neighbourhood (mathematics). The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 51 publications receiving 1997 citations. Previous affiliations of Alison Parkes include University of London & Medical Research Council.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

What Makes People Dissatisfied with their Neighbourhoods

TL;DR: It is concluded that neighbourhood policies with a broad spectrum of goals are required, that pay careful attention to residents' own assessments of local conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Limits to modern contraceptive use among young women in developing countries: a systematic review of qualitative research

TL;DR: Increasing modern contraceptive method use requires community-wide, multifaceted interventions and the combined provision of information, life skills, support and access to youth-friendly services.
Journal ArticleDOI

Living in and leaving poor neighbourhood conditions in England

TL;DR: It is found that residential dissatisfaction is notably higher among residents of poor areas, and they respond to poor neighbourhood conditions in the same way as the general population.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do television and electronic games predict children's psychosocial adjustment? Longitudinal research using the UK Millennium Cohort Study

TL;DR: TV but not electronic games predicted a small increase in conduct problems and screen time did not predict other aspects of psychosocial adjustment, but no associations were found between either type of screen time and emotional symptoms, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems or prosocial behaviour.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impact of a theoretically based sex education programme (SHARE) delivered by teachers on NHS registered conceptions and terminations: final results of cluster randomised trial

TL;DR: This specially designed sex education programme did not reduce conceptions or terminations by age 20 compared with conventional provision and the lack of effect was not due to quality of delivery.