Proximity to mining industry and cancer mortality

Mortality due to lung, laryngeal and bladder cancer in towns lying in the vicinity of combustion installations.

Enrichment of arsenic, lead, and antimony in Balingian coal from Sarawak, Malaysia: Modes of occurrence, origin, and partitioning behaviour during coal combustion

Throughout the world, coal is responsible for generating approximately 38% of power. Coal ash, a waste product, generated from the combustion of coal, consists of fly ash, bottom ash, boiler slag, and flue gas desulfurization material. Fly ash, which is the main component of coal ash, is composed of spherical particulate matter with diameters that range from 0.1 μm to >100 μm. Fly ash is predominately composed of silica, aluminum, iron, calcium, and oxygen, but the particles may also contain heavy metals such as arsenic and lead at trace levels. Most nations throughout the world do not consider fly ash a hazardous waste and therefore regulations on its disposal and storage are lacking. Fly ash that is not beneficially reused in products such as concrete is stored in landfills and surface impoundments. Fugitive dust emissions and leaching of metals into groundwater from landfills and surface impoundments may put people at risk for exposure. There are limited epidemiological studies regarding the health effects of fly ash exposure. In this article, the authors provide an overview of fly ash, its chemical composition, the regulations from nations generating the greatest amount of fly ash, and epidemiological evidence regarding the health impacts associated with exposure to fly ash.

A review on fly ash from coal-fired power plants: chemical composition, regulations, and health evidence

BACKGROUND In North Carolina, coal-burning power plants remain the major source of electrical production. Coal burning generates coal ash that is stored in landfills and slurry ponds that are often located near residential communities, signifying high potential for environmental contamination and increasing health risks. We reviewed the literature on potential health effects of coal-burning plants to summarize current knowledge on health risks.METHODS We searched English-language publications issued between January 1, 1987, and December 31, 2017, on PubMed and Google Scholar.RESULTS The algorithm of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion/exclusion we used provided 113 peer-reviewed publications selected for the review. Over the past 30 years, scientists reported that the people living in close proximity to coal-fired plants had higher rates of all-cause and premature mortality, increased risk of respiratory disease and lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, poorer child health, and higher infant mortality. The elevated health risk was associated with exposure to air pollutants from the power plant emissions and to a spectrum of heavy metals and radioactive isotopes in coal ash.CONCLUSION In North Carolina, further studies are required to profile the severity of the cumulative impacts of multiple air, water, and soil contaminants related to coal-burning power plants and coal ash impoundments on human health and the environment. Prioritized study directions on evaluation of health impacts of coal-burning power plants in North Carolina are suggested.

/pdf/the-impact-of-coal-powered-electrical-plants-and-coal-ash-1pnpx9zxeu.pdf

Alp Aker

Papers

Respiratory complaints and spirometric parameters of the villagers living around the Seyitomer coal-fired thermal power plant in Kütahya, Turkey.