Anders Häggman

TL;DR: Yang et al. as mentioned in this paper investigated how design experts use sketches, physical prototypes, and computer-aided design (CAD) to generate and represent ideas, as well as how these tools are linked to design attributes and multiple measures of design quality.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the interplay between the use and timing of use of sketching and prototyping tools in the context of team design projects, concluding that in certain constrained contexts, the focus should be on the quality of information rather than on the quantity of information generated.

TL;DR: Findings suggest that the timing of design activities is more important than the time spent on them, and that early stage prototypes are created with the express understanding that they will be discarded after evaluation, and are thus "throwaway" prototypes.

TL;DR: An experimental, quantitative methodology from the domain of product design research for evaluating different idea generation methods is described and prominent results from relevant literature and new data from a study of idea generation in the wild are presented.

TL;DR: A simulation study compared 23 young adult drivers’ task completion time, mean glance time, number of glances, and percentage of long glances while performing a navigation entry task with a Garmin portable GPS system and a mobile navigation application on an iPod Touch to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) eye-glance acceptance criteria.