Precision medicine is about matching the right drugs to the right patients. Although this approach is technology agnostic, in cancer there is a tendency to make precision medicine synonymous with genomics. However, genome-based cancer therapeutic matching is limited by incomplete biological understanding of the relationship between phenotype and cancer genotype. This limitation can be addressed by functional testing of live patient tumour cells exposed to potential therapies. Recently, several 'next-generation' functional diagnostic technologies have been reported, including novel methods for tumour manipulation, molecularly precise assays of tumour responses and device-based in situ approaches; these address the limitations of the older generation of chemosensitivity tests. The promise of these new technologies suggests a future diagnostic strategy that integrates functional testing with next-generation sequencing and immunoprofiling to precisely match combination therapies to individual cancer patients.

Precision medicine for cancer with next-generation functional diagnostics

Clinical biomarker tests that aid in making treatment decisions will play an important role in achieving personalized medicine for cancer patients. Definitive evaluation of the clinical utility of these biomarkers requires conducting large randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Efficient RCT design is therefore crucial for timely introduction of these medical advances into clinical practice, and a variety of designs have been proposed for this purpose. To guide design and interpretation of RCTs evaluating biomarkers, we present an in-depth comparison of advantages and disadvantages of the commonly used designs. Key aspects of the discussion include efficiency comparisons and special interim monitoring issues that arise because of the complexity of these RCTs. Important ongoing and completed trials are used as examples. We conclude that, in most settings, randomized biomarker-stratified designs (ie, designs that use the biomarker to guide analysis but not treatment assignment) should be used to obtain a rigorous assessment of biomarker clinical utility.

Randomized Clinical Trials With Biomarkers: Design Issues

Clonogenic assay with established human tumour xenografts: correlation of in vitro to in vivo activity as a basis for anticancer drug discovery.

Receptors for extracellular nucleotides are widely expressed by mammalian cells. They mediate a large array of responses ranging from growth stimulation to apoptosis, from chemotaxis to cell differentiation and from nociception to cytokine release, as well as neurotransmission. Pharma industry is involved in the development and clinical testing of drugs selectively targeting the different P1 nucleoside and P2 nucleotide receptor subtypes. As described in detail in the present review, P2 receptors are expressed by all tumours, in some cases to a very high level. Activation or inhibition of selected P2 receptor subtypes brings about cancer cell death or growth inhibition. The field has been largely neglected by current research in oncology, yet the evidence presented in this review, most of which is based on in vitro studies, although with a limited amount from in vivo experiments and human studies, warrants further efforts to explore the therapeutic potential of purinoceptor targeting in cancer.

/pdf/purinergic-signalling-and-cancer-eibdgev4a8.pdf

Purinergic signalling and cancer

Purpose To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Technology Assessment guidelines on chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays (CSRAs) published in 2004. Methods An Update Working Group reviewed data published between December 1, 2003, and May 31, 2010. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched. The literature search yielded 11,313 new articles. The limits for “human and English” were used, and then standard ASCO search strings for randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, guidelines, and reviews were added, yielding 1,298 articles for abstract review. Of these, only 21 articles met predefined inclusion criteria and underwent full text review, and five reports of randomized controlled trials were included for data extraction. Results Review of the literature does not identify any CSRAs for which the evidence base is sufficient to support use in oncology practice. Recommendations The use of CSRAs to select chemotherapeutic agents for individual patients is not recommended out...

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Use of Chemotherapy Sensitivity and Resistance Assays

The primary aim of this randomized trial was to determine response rate and progression-free survival following chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, who had been treated according to an ATP-based tumour chemosensitivity assay in comparison with physician's choice. A total of 180 patients were randomized to assay-directed therapy (n=94) or physician's-choice chemotherapy (n=86). Median follow-up at analysis was 18 months. Response was assessable in 147 patients: 31.5% achieved a partial or complete response in the physician's-choice group compared with 40.5% in the assay-directed group (26 versus 31% by intention-to-treat analysis respectively). Intention-to-treat analysis showed a median progression-free survival of 93 days in the physician's-choice group and 104 days in the assay-directed group (hazard ratio 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.59-1.10, not significant). No difference was seen in overall survival between the groups, although 12/39 (41%) of patients who crossed over from the physician's-choice arm obtained a response. Increased use of combination therapy was seen in the physician's-choice arm during the study as a result of the observed effects of assay-directed therapy in patients. Patients entering the physician's-choice arm of the study during the first year did significantly worse than those who entered in the subsequent years (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.9, P<0.03). This small randomized clinical trial has documented a trend towards improved response and progression-free survival for assay-directed treatment. Chemosensitivity testing might provide useful information in some patients with ovarian cancer, although a larger trial is required to confirm this. The ATP-based tumour chemosensitivity assay remains an investigational method in this condition.

A prospective randomized controlled trial of tumour chemosensitivity assay directed chemotherapy versus physician's choice in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Background
We wished to evaluate the clinical response following ATP-Tumor Chemosensitivity Assay (ATP-TCA) directed salvage chemotherapy in a series of UK patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The results are compared with that of a similar assay used in a different country in terms of evaluability and clinical endpoints.

/pdf/outcome-of-atp-based-tumor-chemosensitivity-assay-directed-14iz4vv8u4.pdf

Outcome of ATP-based tumor chemosensitivity assay directed chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated recurrent ovarian carcinoma.

The cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines has largely prevented dose intensification, but the use of liposomal preparations (e.g. Caelyx/Doxil) allows much higher intra-tumoral concentrations to be achieved without cardiotoxicity. However, it is uncertain how much this will improve response rates over standard anthracycline therapy. The ATP-based chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA) has been used to develop new regimens for several tumor types, to investigate the molecular basis of chemosensitivity and shows considerable promise as a clinical method for individualizing chemotherapy. In this study, we have used the ATP-TCA to determine the concentration responsiveness of tumor-derived cells to concentrations of doxorubicin. The 22 tumor samples included were obtained from 20 heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Eight had previous anthracycline exposure, four as part of the CAP regimen. The results show more than 95% inhibition at clinically achievable concentrations in 11 of 22 tumors tested. Of the rest, seven showed a plateau effect between 80 and 95% inhibition, suggesting that there might be a subset of resistant cells present that is not inhibited by high concentrations of doxorubicin. Two tumors showed complete resistance and neither of these had previously received anthracycline therapy. As it has been suggested that gemcitabine might enhance anthracycline sensitivity in combination and we have had good results with gemcitabine modulation of alkylating agents in the assay, we have tested the combination of doxorubicin+gemcitabine under assay conditions in 11 tumors with little indication of improvement. In conclusion, doxorubicin at concentrations achievable with liposomal preparations shows strong ex vivo activity against pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer in just over half of the cases tested. [# 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.]

Andrew C Hindley

Papers

A prospective randomized controlled trial of tumour chemosensitivity assay directed chemotherapy versus physician's choice in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Outcome of ATP-based tumor chemosensitivity assay directed chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated recurrent ovarian carcinoma.

The ex vivo effect of high concentrations of doxorubicin on recurrent ovarian carcinoma.