Fluid dynamics is fundamental to our understanding of the atmosphere and oceans. Although many of the same principles of fluid dynamics apply to both the atmosphere and oceans, textbooks tend to concentrate on the atmosphere, the ocean, or the theory of geophysical fluid dynamics (GFD). This textbook provides a comprehensive unified treatment of atmospheric and oceanic fluid dynamics. The book introduces the fundamentals of geophysical fluid dynamics, including rotation and stratification, vorticity and potential vorticity, and scaling and approximations. It discusses baroclinic and barotropic instabilities, wave-mean flow interactions and turbulence, and the general circulation of the atmosphere and ocean. Student problems and exercises are included at the end of each chapter. Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics: Fundamentals and Large-Scale Circulation will be an invaluable graduate textbook on advanced courses in GFD, meteorology, atmospheric science and oceanography, and an excellent review volume for researchers. Additional resources are available at www.cambridge.org/9780521849692.

/pdf/atmospheric-and-oceanic-fluid-dynamics-fundamentals-and-299pddn1ga.pdf

Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics: Fundamentals and Large-Scale Circulation

Stratospheric sudden warmings are the clearest and strongest manifestation of dynamical coupling in the stratosphere–troposphere system. While many sudden warmings have been individually documented in the literature, this study aims at constructing a comprehensive climatology: all major midwinter warming events are identified and classified, in both the NCEP–NCAR and 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40) datasets. To accomplish this a new, objective identification algorithm is developed. This algorithm identifies sudden warmings based on the zonal mean zonal wind at 60°N and 10 hPa, and classifies them into events that do and do not split the stratospheric polar vortex. Major midwinter stratospheric sudden warmings are found to occur with a frequency of approximately six events per decade, and 46% of warming events lead to a splitting of the stratospheric polar vortex. The dynamics of vortex splitting events is contrasted to that of events where the vortex is merely displaced off the pole. In the stratosphere, the two types of events are found to be dynamically distinct: vortex splitting events occur after a clear preconditioning of the polar vortex, and their influence on middle-stratospheric temperatures lasts for up to 20 days longer than vortex displacement events. In contrast, the influence of sudden warmings on the tropospheric state is found to be largely insensitive to the event type. Finally, a table of dynamical benchmarks for major stratospheric sudden warming events is compiled. These benchmarks are used in a companion study to evaluate current numerical model simulations of the stratosphere.

/pdf/a-new-look-at-stratospheric-sudden-warmings-part-i-4hb6jludc0.pdf

A New Look at Stratospheric Sudden Warmings. Part I: Climatology and Modeling Benchmarks

Roughly 90% of atmospheric ozone is found in the lower stratosphere in the ozone layer Since about the 1970s, anthropogenic emissions of ozone-depleting gases have led to depletion of ~3–4% of the total overhead ozone averaged over the globe 1  The strongest depletion is found over Antarctica during spring, when photochemical processes combine with a unique set of meteorological conditions to greatly increase the effectiveness of ozone-depleting gases, and more than half of the total overhead ozone is destroyed Characteristics of the resulting Antarctic ozone hole are reviewed in refs 1 and 2, and the identification and attribution of the phenomenon was recently celebrated in a special edition of Nature (http://wwwnaturecom/nature/focus/ ozonehole/) The Antarctic ozone hole is evident in ozone observations taken every spring since about the early 1980s 1  Its annual onset coincides with the return of sunlight to the cold polar stratosphere during September/October, and its decay with the collapse of the stratospheric vortex during November/December 1,2  The most obvious surface impact is an increase in ultraviolet radiation reaching the surface 1  Over the past decade, however, it has become clear that the ozone hole is also associated with widespread changes in the Southern Hemisphere tropospheric circulation and surface climate Our purpose here is to review the evidence that suggests that the Antarctic ozone hole has had a demonstrable effect on the surface climate of the Southern Hemisphere The ozone hole and Southern Hemisphere circulation Ozone absorbs incoming solar radiation Hence the depletion of ozone over Antarctica leads to cooling of the polar stratosphere 2,3

https://www.atmos.colostate.edu/~davet/ao/ThompsonPapers/Thompson_etal_NatureGeoscience2011.pdf

Signatures of the Antarctic ozone hole in Southern Hemisphere surface climate change

The NCAR Community Earth System Model (CESM) now includes an atmospheric component that extends in altitude to the lower thermosphere. This atmospheric model, known as the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM), includes fully interactive chemistry, allowing, for example, a self-consistent representationofthedevelopmentandrecoveryofthestratosphericozoneholeanditseffectonthetroposphere.This paper focuses on analysis of an ensemble of transient simulations using CESM1(WACCM), covering the period from the preindustrial era to present day, conducted as part of phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. Variability in the stratosphere, such as that associated with stratospheric sudden warmings and the development of the ozone hole, is in good agreement with observations. The signals of these phenomena propagate into the troposphere, influencing near-surface winds, precipitation rates, and the extent of sea ice. In comparison of tropospheric climate change predictions with those from a version of CESM that does not fully resolve the stratosphere, the global-mean temperature trends are indistinguishable. However, systematic differences do exist in other climate variables, particularly in the extratropics. The magnitude of the difference can be as large as the climate change response itself. This indicates that the representation of stratosphere‐ troposphere coupling could be a major source of uncertainty in climate change projections in CESM.

/pdf/climate-change-from-1850-to-2005-simulated-in-cesm1-waccm-4chejh3sww.pdf

Climate Change from 1850 to 2005 Simulated in CESM1(WACCM)

The mechanism behind the severely cold winters experienced by the mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere in recent years is not fully understood. Here, the authors combine observational analyses and model experiments to reveal a dynamic connection between Arctic sea-ice cover and the polar stratosphere.

/pdf/weakening-of-the-stratospheric-polar-vortex-by-arctic-sea-1le2au24z2.pdf

Weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex by Arctic sea-ice loss

The simulation of major midwinter stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs) in six stratosphere-resolving general circulation models (GCMs) is examined. The GCMs are compared to a new climatology of SSWs, based on the dynamical characteristics of the events. First, the number, type, and temporal distribution of SSW events are evaluated. Most of the models show a lower frequency of SSW events than the climatology, which has a mean frequency of 6.0 SSWs per decade. Statistical tests show that three of the six models produce significantly fewer SSWs than the climatology, between 1.0 and 2.6 SSWs per decade. Second, four process-based diagnostics are calculated for all of the SSW events in each model. It is found that SSWs in the GCMs compare favorably with dynamical benchmarks for SSW established in the first part of the study. These results indicate that GCMs are capable of quite accurately simulating the dynamics required to produce SSWs, but with lower frequency than the climatology. Further dynamical diagnostics hint that, in at least one case, this is due to a lack of meridional heat flux in the lower stratosphere. Even though the SSWs simulated by most GCMs are dynamically realistic when compared to the NCEP-NCAR reanalysis, the reasons for the relative paucity of SSWs in GCMs remains an important and open question.

/pdf/a-new-look-at-stratospheric-sudden-warmings-part-ii-3pjb5rgvrb.pdf

A New Look at Stratospheric Sudden Warmings. Part II: Evaluation of Numerical Model Simulations

Using a hierarchy of models, and observations, the effect of vertical shear in the lower stratosphere on baroclinic instability in the tropospheric midlatitude jet is examined. It is found that increasing stratospheric shear increases the phase speed of growing baroclinic waves, increases the growth rate of modes with low synoptic wavenumbers, and decreases the growth rate of modes with higher wavenumbers. The meridional structure of the linear modes, and their acceleration of the zonal mean jet, changes with increasing stratospheric shear, but in a way that apparently contradicts the observed stratosphere–troposphere northern annular mode (NAM) connection. This contradiction is resolved at finite amplitude. In nonlinear life cycle experiments it is found that increasing stratospheric shear, without changing the jet structure in the troposphere, produces a transition from anticyclonic (LC1) to cyclonic (LC2) behavior at wavenumber 7. All life cycles with wavenumbers lower than 7 are LC1, and all with wavenumber greater than 7 are LC2. For the LC1 life cycles, the effect of increasing stratospheric shear is to increase the poleward displacement of the zonal mean jet by the eddies, which is consistent with the observed stratosphere–troposphere NAM connection. Finally, it is found that the connection between high stratospheric shear and high-tropospheric NAM is present by NCEP–NCAR reanalysis data.

/pdf/the-effect-of-lower-stratospheric-shear-on-baroclinic-nywz77gh85.pdf

The Effect of Lower Stratospheric Shear on Baroclinic Instability

Using an idealized primitive equation model, we investigate how stratospheric conditions alter the development of baroclinic instability in the troposphere. Starting from the lifecycle paradigm of Thorncroft et al., we consider the evolution of baroclinic lifecycles resulting from the addition of a stratospheric jet to the LC1 initial condition. We find that the addition of the stratospheric jet yields a net surface geopotential height anomaly that strongly resembles the Arctic Oscillation. With the additional modification of the tropospheric winds to resemble the high-AO climatology, the surface response is amplified by a factor 10 and, though dominated by the tropospheric changes, shows similar sensitivity to the stratospheric conditions.

/pdf/stratospheric-influence-on-baroclinic-lifecycles-and-its-mmr262hh08.pdf

Stratospheric influence on baroclinic lifecycles and its connection to the Arctic Oscillation

[1] Using an idealized primitive equation model, we investigate how stratospheric conditions alter the development of baroclinic instability in the troposphere. Starting from the lifecycle paradigm of Thorncroft et al., we consider the evolution of baroclinic lifecycles resulting from the addition of a stratospheric jet to the LC1 initial condition. We find that the addition of the stratospheric jet yields a net surface geopotential height anomaly that strongly resembles the Arctic Oscillation. With the additional modification of the tropospheric winds to resemble the high-AO climatology, the surface response is amplified by a factor 10 and, though dominated by the tropospheric changes, shows similar sensitivity to the stratospheric conditions. INDEX TERMS: 3334 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Middle atmosphere dynamics (0341, 0342); 3337 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Numerical modeling and data assimilation; 3362 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Stratosphere/troposphere interactions. Citation: Wittman, M. A. H., L. M. Polvani, R. K. Scott, and A. J. Charlton (2004), Stratospheric influence on baroclinic lifecycles and its connection to the Arctic Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L16113, doi:10.1029/2004GL020503.

Andrew J. Charlton

Papers

A New Look at Stratospheric Sudden Warmings. Part I: Climatology and Modeling Benchmarks

A New Look at Stratospheric Sudden Warmings. Part II: Evaluation of Numerical Model Simulations

The Effect of Lower Stratospheric Shear on Baroclinic Instability

Stratospheric influence on baroclinic lifecycles and its connection to the Arctic Oscillation

Stratospheric influence on baroclinic lifecycles and its connection to the