scispace - formally typeset
A

Andrew J. Molyneux

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  126
Citations -  17316

Andrew J. Molyneux is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Aneurysm & International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial. The author has an hindex of 51, co-authored 121 publications receiving 15406 citations. Previous affiliations of Andrew J. Molyneux include Frenchay Hospital & John Radcliffe Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms : a randomised trial

Andrew J. Molyneux
- 26 Oct 2002 - 
TL;DR: In patients with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm, for which endov vascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping are therapeutic options, the outcome in terms of survival free of disability at 1 year is significantly better with endovascular coiling.
Journal ArticleDOI

International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion

TL;DR: In patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms suitable for both treatments, endovascular coiling is more likely to result in independent survival at 1 year than neurosurgical clipping; the survival benefit continues for at least 7 years.
Journal ArticleDOI

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial.

TL;DR: In patients with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm, for which endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping are therapeutic options, the outcome in terms of survival free of disability at 1 year is significantly better with endov vascular coiling.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up

TL;DR: There was an increased risk of recurrent bleeding from a coiled aneurysm compared with a clipped aneurYSm, but the risks were small and the risk of death at 5 years was significantly lower in the coiled group than it was in the clipped group.