scispace - formally typeset
A

Anne M. Stiggelbout

Researcher at Leiden University Medical Center

Publications -  330
Citations -  17621

Anne M. Stiggelbout is an academic researcher from Leiden University Medical Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Breast cancer. The author has an hindex of 67, co-authored 294 publications receiving 15419 citations. Previous affiliations of Anne M. Stiggelbout include Netherlands Cancer Institute & Leiden University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Why do medical residents prefer paternalistic decision making? An interview study

TL;DR: In this paper , residents' decision-making behavior appeared strongly affected by their conviction that they are responsible for arriving at the correct diagnosis and providing the best evidence-based treatment, and they confuse SDM with acquiring informed consent with the physician's treatment recommendations and with letting patients decide which treatment they prefer in case no evidence based guideline recommendation is available.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why do medical residents prefer paternalistic decision making? An interview study

TL;DR: In this article , residents' decision-making behavior appeared strongly affected by their conviction that they are responsible for arriving at the correct diagnosis and providing the best evidence-based treatment, and they confuse SDM with acquiring informed consent with the physician's treatment recommendations and with letting patients decide which treatment they prefer in case no evidence based guideline recommendation is available.
Journal ArticleDOI

Metastatic breast cancer in older patients: A longitudinal assessment of geriatric outcomes.

TL;DR: The prevalence of distress, depressive symptoms, apathy and loneliness in older patients with metastatic breast cancer is high and timely detection, for which a geriatric assessment is effective, could potentially improve quality of life.
Journal ArticleDOI

Determinants of participation in a cardiometabolic health check among underserved groups

TL;DR: It is concluded that the ‘hard-to-reach’ population may not be unwilling to participate in the non-invasive health risk assessment (HRA) and a more comprehensive approach, involving key figures within a community informing people about and providing help completing the HRA, would possibly be more suitable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Valuing health: does enriching a scenario lead to higher utilities?

TL;DR: This study found that patients have been found to value their own experienced health state higher than an investigator-constructed scenario of that health state and if ``enriching'' this scenario by adding individualized attributes reduces the differences between experienced health and the scenario.