A
Anne M. Stiggelbout
Researcher at Leiden University Medical Center
Publications - 330
Citations - 17621
Anne M. Stiggelbout is an academic researcher from Leiden University Medical Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Breast cancer. The author has an hindex of 67, co-authored 294 publications receiving 15419 citations. Previous affiliations of Anne M. Stiggelbout include Netherlands Cancer Institute & Leiden University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol
Trudy van der Weijden,Antoine Boivin,Jako S. Burgers,Haske van Veenendaal,Anne M. Stiggelbout,Marjan J. Faber,Glyn Elwyn +6 more
TL;DR: It is hypothesise that clinical practice guidelines can be adapted to facilitate the integration of individual patients' preferences in clinical decision making, and to provide the needed background for recommendations about potential effective and feasible strategies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Response shift in quality of life measurement in early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
TL;DR: Assessment of response shift, scale recalibration and changes in values in early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy found the impact of radiotherapy on fatigue and overall quality of life would have been underestimated.
Journal ArticleDOI
Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: A plea for integrated empirical ethics research
TL;DR: It is demonstrated how both the production and presentation of scientific information in an evidence-based decision-support contain implicit presuppositions and values, which pre-structure the moral environment of the clinical process of decision-making.
Journal ArticleDOI
The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review
Fania R Gärtner,Hanna Bomhof-Roordink,Ian P Smith,Isabelle Scholl,Isabelle Scholl,Anne M. Stiggelbout,Arwen H. Pieterse +6 more
TL;DR: The choice for the most appropriate instrument can best be based on the instrument’s content and characteristics such as the perspective that they assess, as well as the use of COSMIN-guidelines to help guarantee high-quality evaluations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Importance of clarifying patients’ desired role in shared decision making to match their level of engagement with their preferences
Mary C. Politi,Don S. Dizon,Dominick L. Frosch,Dominick L. Frosch,Dominick L. Frosch,Marie D. Kuzemchak,Anne M. Stiggelbout +6 more
TL;DR: The authors should not assume that certain groups of patients don’t want to or can’ts participate in decisions about their healthcare, say Mary Politi and colleagues, and they offer advice on how to determine how much patients want to be involved.