Mapping human brain function is a long-standing goal of neuroscience that promises to inform the development of new treatments for brain disorders. Early maps of human brain function were based on locations of brain damage or brain stimulation that caused a functional change. Over time, this approach was largely replaced by technologies such as functional neuroimaging, which identify brain regions in which activity is correlated with behaviours or symptoms. Despite their advantages, these technologies reveal correlations, not causation. This creates challenges for interpreting the data generated from these tools and using them to develop treatments for brain disorders. A return to causal mapping of human brain function based on brain lesions and brain stimulation is underway. New approaches can combine these causal sources of information with modern neuroimaging and electrophysiology techniques to gain new insights into the functions of specific brain areas. In this Review, we provide a definition of causality for translational research, propose a continuum along which to assess the relative strength of causal information from human brain mapping studies and discuss recent advances in causal brain mapping and their relevance for developing treatments. 

Causal mapping of human brain function

Purpose of review Focal lesions causing specific neurological or psychiatric symptoms can occur in multiple different brain locations, complicating symptom localization. Here, we review lesion network mapping, a technique used to aid localization by mapping lesion-induced symptoms to brain circuits rather than individual brain regions. We highlight recent examples of how this technique is being used to investigate clinical entities and identify therapeutic targets. Recent findings To date, lesion network mapping has successfully been applied to more than 40 different symptoms or symptom complexes. In each case, lesion locations were combined with an atlas of human brain connections (the human connectome) to map heterogeneous lesion locations causing the same symptom to a common brain circuit. This approach has lent insight into symptoms that have been difficult to localize using other techniques, such as hallucinations, tics, blindsight, and pathological laughter and crying. Further, lesion network mapping has recently been applied to lesions that improve symptoms, such as tremor and addiction, which may translate into new therapeutic targets. Summary Lesion network mapping can be used to map lesion-induced symptoms to brain circuits rather than single brain regions. Recent findings have provided insight into long-standing clinical mysteries and identified testable treatment targets for circuit-based and symptom-based neuromodulation. 

Lesion network mapping for symptom localization: recent developments and future directions

Lead-DBS v3.0: Mapping deep brain stimulation effects to local anatomy and global networks

Hypersynchrony of neuronal activity is associated with several neurological disorders, including essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease (PD). Chronic high-frequency deep brain stimulation (HF DBS) is the standard of care for medically refractory PD. Symptoms may effectively be suppressed by HF DBS, but return shortly after cessation of stimulation. Coordinated reset (CR) stimulation is a theory-based stimulation technique that was designed to specifically counteract neuronal synchrony by desynchronization. During CR, phase-shifted stimuli are delivered to multiple neuronal subpopulations. Computational studies on CR stimulation of plastic neuronal networks revealed long-lasting desynchronization effects obtained by down-regulating abnormal synaptic connectivity. This way, networks are moved into attractors of stable desynchronized states such that stimulation-induced desynchronization persists after cessation of stimulation. Preclinical and clinical studies confirmed corresponding long-lasting therapeutic and desynchronizing effects in PD. As PD symptoms are associated with different pathological synchronous rhythms, stimulation-induced long-lasting desynchronization effects should favorably be robust to variations of the stimulation frequency. Recent computational studies suggested that this robustness can be improved by randomizing the timings of stimulus deliveries. We study the long-lasting effects of CR stimulation with randomized stimulus amplitudes and/or randomized stimulus timing in networks of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons with spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Performing computer simulations and analytical calculations, we study long-lasting desynchronization effects of CR with and without randomization of stimulus amplitudes alone, randomization of stimulus times alone as well as the combination of both. Varying the CR stimulation frequency (with respect to the frequency of abnormal target rhythm) and the number of separately stimulated neuronal subpopulations, we reveal parameter regions and related mechanisms where the two qualitatively different randomization mechanisms improve the robustness of long-lasting desynchronization effects of CR. In particular, for clinically relevant parameter ranges double-random CR stimulation, i.e., CR stimulation with the specific combination of stimulus amplitude randomization and stimulus time randomization, may outperform regular CR stimulation with respect to long-lasting desynchronization. In addition, our results provide the first evidence that an effective reduction of the overall stimulation current by stimulus amplitude randomization may improve the frequency robustness of long-lasting therapeutic effects of brain stimulation.

/pdf/long-lasting-desynchronization-of-plastic-neuronal-networks-snlvpxl9.pdf

Long-Lasting Desynchronization of Plastic Neuronal Networks by Double-Random Coordinated Reset Stimulation

Abstract Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) such as affective disorders, psychosis, behavioral changes, and cognitive impairment are common in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, NPSs remain under-recognized and under-treated, often leading to adverse outcomes. Their epidemiology, presentation, risk factors, neural substrate, and management strategies are incompletely understood. While psychological and psychosocial factors may contribute, hallmark PD neuropathophysiological changes, plus the associations between exposure to dopaminergic medications and occurrence of some symptoms, suggest a neurobiological basis for many NPSs. A range of psychotropic medications, psychotherapeutic techniques, stimulation therapies, and other non-pharmacological treatments have been studied, are used clinically, and are beneficial for managing NPSs in PD. Appropriate management of NPSs is critical for comprehensive PD care, from recognizing their presentations and timing throughout the disease course, to the incorporation of different therapeutic strategies (ie, pharmacological and non-pharmacological) that utilize a multidisciplinary approach.

/pdf/management-of-psychiatric-and-cognitive-complications-in-2tjdvc0z.pdf

Management of psychiatric and cognitive complications in Parkinson’s disease

Abstract Deep brain stimulation is an effective treatment for Parkinson’s disease but can be complicated by side-effects such as cognitive decline. There is often a delay before this side-effect is apparent and the mechanism is unknown, making it difficult to identify patients at risk or select appropriate deep brain stimulation settings. Here, we test whether connectivity between the stimulation site and other brain regions is associated with cognitive decline following deep brain stimulation. First, we studied a unique patient cohort with cognitive decline following subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease (n = 10) where reprogramming relieved the side-effect without loss of motor benefit. Using resting state functional connectivity data from a large normative cohort (n = 1000), we computed connectivity between each stimulation site and the subiculum, an a priori brain region functionally connected to brain lesions causing memory impairment. Connectivity between deep brain stimulation sites and this same subiculum region was significantly associated with deep brain stimulation induced cognitive decline (P < 0.02). We next performed a data-driven analysis to identify connections most associated with deep brain stimulation induced cognitive decline. Deep brain stimulation sites causing cognitive decline (versus those that did not) were more connected to the anterior cingulate, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, and cognitive regions of the cerebellum (PFWE < 0.05). The spatial topography of this deep brain stimulation-based circuit for cognitive decline aligned with an a priori lesion-based circuit for memory impairment (P = 0.017). To begin translating these results into a clinical tool that might be used for deep brain stimulation programming, we generated a ‘heat map’ in which the intensity of each voxel reflects the connectivity to our cognitive decline circuit. We then validated this heat map using an independent dataset of Parkinson’s disease patients in which cognitive performance was measured following subthalamic deep brain stimulation (n = 33). Intersection of deep brain stimulation sites with our heat map was correlated with changes in the Mattis dementia rating scale 1 year after lead implantation (r = 0.39; P = 0.028). Finally, to illustrate how this heat map might be used in clinical practice, we present a case that was flagged as ‘high risk’ for cognitive decline based on intersection of the patient’s deep brain stimulation site with our heat map. This patient had indeed experienced cognitive decline and our heat map was used to select alternative deep brain stimulation parameters. At 14 days follow-up the patient’s cognition improved without loss of motor benefit. These results lend insight into the mechanism of deep brain stimulation induced cognitive decline and suggest that connectivity-based heat maps may help identify patients at risk and who might benefit from deep brain stimulation reprogramming.

/pdf/a-brain-network-for-deep-brain-stimulation-induced-cognitive-1qe4765h.pdf

A brain network for deep brain stimulation induced cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established clinical therapy, but an anatomically clear definition of the underlying neural target(s) of the stimulation remains elusive. Patient-specific models of DBS are commonly used tools in the search for stimulation targets, and recent iterations of those models are focused on characterizing the brain connections that are activated by DBS.The goal of this study was to quantify axonal pathway activation in the subthalamic region from DBS at different electrode locations and stimulation settings.We used an anatomically and electrically detailed computational model of subthalamic DBS to generate recruitment curves for eight different axonal pathways of interest, at three generalized DBS electrode locations in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) (ie, central STN, dorsal STN, posterior STN). These simulations were performed with three levels of DBS electrode localization uncertainty (ie, 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm).The recruitment curves highlight the diversity of pathways that are theoretically activated with subthalamic DBS, in addition to the dependence of the stimulation location and parameter settings on the pathway activation estimates. The three generalized DBS locations exhibited distinct pathway recruitment curve profiles, suggesting that each stimulation location would have a different effect on network activity patterns. We also found that the use of anodic stimuli could help limit activation of the internal capsule relative to other pathways. However, incorporating realistic levels of DBS electrode localization uncertainty in the models substantially limits their predictive capabilities.Subtle differences in stimulation location and/or parameter settings can impact the collection of pathways that are activated during subthalamic DBS. 

Anneke M Frankemolle-Gilbert

Papers

A brain network for deep brain stimulation induced cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease

Model-Based Analysis of Pathway Recruitment During Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation.