Environmental pollution has been on the rise in the past few decades owing to increased human activities on energy reservoirs, unsafe agricultural practices and rapid industrialization. Amongst the pollutants that are of environmental and public health concerns due to their toxicities are: heavy metals, nuclear wastes, pesticides, green house gases, and hydrocarbons. Remediation of polluted sites using microbial process (bioremediation) has proven effective and reliable due to its eco-friendly features. Bioremediation can either be carried out ex situ or in situ, depending on several factors, which include but not limited to cost, site characteristics, type and concentration of pollutants. Generally, ex situ techniques apparently are more expensive compared to in situ techniques as a result of additional cost attributable to excavation. However, cost of on-site installation of equipment, and inability to effectively visualize and control the subsurface of polluted sites are of major concerns when carrying out in situ bioremediation. Therefore, choosing appropriate bioremediation technique, which will effectively reduce pollutant concentrations to an innocuous state, is crucial for a successful bioremediation project. Furthermore, the two major approaches to enhance bioremediation are biostimulation and bioaugmentation provided that environmental factors, which determine the success of bioremediation, are maintained at optimal range. This review provides more insight into the two major bioremediation techniques, their principles, advantages, limitations and prospects.

/pdf/bioremediation-techniques-classification-based-on-site-of-1qv5gkq5ia.pdf

Bioremediation techniques–classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects

The global use of petroleum hydrocarbons for energy and raw materials in various applications has increased with extensive release of a wide variety of contaminants into the environment, affecting soil, surface water and groundwater. The effect results to numerous health, ecological and environmental issues. However, treatment of contamination and pollution caused by petroleum hydrocarbons is a huge and laborious work. It involves several in situ or ex situ treatments comprising containment, separation and destruction which include biological, chemical, physico-chemical, thermal and heat, electric and electromagnetic, acoustic and ultrasonic treatment methods. These treatment methods involve several other techniques and strategies as listed in this review. The health risks pose by petroleum hydrocarbon pollution have driven scientists to research, develop and implement risk-based remediation strategies for restoration and reclamation of affected environments. To select the best treatment option for remediation, it is important to comprehend the nature, composition, properties, sources of pollution, type of environment, fate, transport and distribution of the pollutants, mechanism of degradation, interaction and relationships with microorganisms, the intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting remediation. It helps to evaluate and predict the chemical behaviour of the pollutants with the short and long-term effects and mitigate the effects of pollution and limit exposure to the pollutants. Despite the available remediation options for petroleum hydrocarbon management and removal, sufficient and complete remediation can be implemented by adoption of proper approach derived from risk-based management procedure that can be practical, scientifically defensible, widely adapted, sustainable, non-invasive, eco-friendly and cost-efficient. This paper provides an overview of the various remediation and treatment technologies derived from risk-based approaches that are used for isolation, containment, separation, restoration reclamation and remediation of soil, sediments, surface water and groundwater contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons and organic compounds.

Remediation of soil and water contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon: A review

Adsorption of emerging contaminants from water and wastewater by modified biochar: A review.

https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/146158/3/Advanced_technologies_remediation_2017_Postprint.pdf

Advanced technologies for the remediation of pesticide-contaminated soils

Salinity stress is one of the major abiotic stresses limiting crop production in arid and semi-arid regions. Interest is increasing in the application of PGPRs (plant growth promoting rhizobacteria) to ameliorate stresses such as salinity stress in crop production. The identification of salt-tolerant, or halophilic, PGPRs has the potential to promote saline soil-based agriculture. Halophytes are a useful reservoir of halotolerant bacteria with plant growth-promoting capabilities. Here, we review recent studies on the use of halophilic PGPRs to stimulate plant growth and increase the tolerance of non-halophytic crops to salinity. These studies illustrate that halophilic PGPRs from the rhizosphere of halophytic species can be effective bio-inoculants for promoting the production of non-halophytic species in saline soils. These studies support the viability of bioinoculation with halophilic PGPRs as a strategy for the sustainable enhancement of non-halophytic crop growth. The potential of this strategy is discussed within the context of ensuring sustainable food production for a world with an increasing population and continuing climate change. We also explore future research needs for using halotolerant PGPRs under salinity stress.

/pdf/mining-halophytes-for-plant-growth-promoting-halotolerant-1rh0jrfxd3.pdf

Mining Halophytes for Plant Growth-Promoting Halotolerant Bacteria to Enhance the Salinity Tolerance of Non-halophytic Crops.

Soil salinization affects 1–10 billion ha worldwide, threatening the agricultural production needed to feed the ever increasing world population. Phytoremediation may be a cost-effective option for the remediation of these soils. This review analyzes the viability of using phytoremediation for salt-affected soils and explores the remedial mechanisms involved. In addition, it specifically addresses the debate over plant indirect (via soil cation exchange enhancement) or direct (via uptake) role in salt remediation. Analysis of experimental data for electrical conductivity (ECe) + sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) reduction and plant salt uptake showed a similar removal efficiency between salt phytoremediation and other treatment options, with the added potential for phytoextraction under non-leaching conditions. A focus is also given on recent studies that indicate potential pathways for increased salt phytoextraction, co-treatment with other contaminants, and phytoremediation applicability for salt flow control. Finally, this work also details the predicted effects of climate change on soil salinization and on treatment options. The synergetic effects of extreme climate events and salinization are a challenging obstacle for future phytoremediation applications, which will require additional and multi-disciplinary research efforts.

Phytoremediation of salt-affected soils: a review of processes, applicability, and the impact of climate change.

In situ aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated solvents: a review.

Bacillus thuringiensis a promising bacterium for degrading emerging pollutants

Bioelectrochemically-assisted reductive dechlorination of 1,2-dichloroethane by a Dehalococcoides-enriched microbial culture

Pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) are common contaminants found in surface and groundwaters, often due to their inefficient removal from wastewater treatment plants. One way in which these compounds can be removed is via aerobic cometabolism, a process that involves oxygenases produced by microorganisms. Limited work has been done examining the efficacy of cometabolism in the removal of PhACs. Therefore, the aim of this work was to investigate the use of an alkane (pentane) in the aerobic cometabolic transformations of paracetamol, ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, and nimesulide. Both paracetamol and ibuprofen (single aromatic compounds) were readily transformed, with net specific biodegradation rates equal to 1.6 and 3.2 μmol/gcell/day, respectively. Conversely, the two aromatic ring PhACs showed slower (naproxen and nimesulide) or no transformation (diclofenac). In addition, four of the tested PhACs (ibuprofen, paracetamol, naproxen and nimesulide) did not inhibit pentane uptake.

Anthony S. Danko

Papers

Phytoremediation of salt-affected soils: a review of processes, applicability, and the impact of climate change.

In situ aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated solvents: a review.

Bacillus thuringiensis a promising bacterium for degrading emerging pollutants

Bioelectrochemically-assisted reductive dechlorination of 1,2-dichloroethane by a Dehalococcoides-enriched microbial culture

Cometabolic Degradation of Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Pharmaceuticals by a Pentane Enrichment Culture