scispace - formally typeset
A

Antonio Filippin

Researcher at University of Milan

Publications -  76
Citations -  2131

Antonio Filippin is an academic researcher from University of Milan. The author has contributed to research in topics: Risk aversion & Inequality. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 72 publications receiving 1776 citations. Previous affiliations of Antonio Filippin include Institute for the Study of Labor.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Family Background, Self-Confidence and Economic Outcomes

TL;DR: In this article, the role played by self-confidence, modeled as beliefs about one's ability, in shaping task choices is analyzed, where fully rational agents exploit all the available information to update their beliefs using Bayes' rule, eventually learning their true type.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Effect of Tax Enforcement on Tax Morale

TL;DR: In this article, tax enforcement is an additional contextual factor affecting tax morale, one of the most important determinants of tax compliance, and the impact of tax enforcement and social environment is stronger at low quantiles of tax morale.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes

TL;DR: The authors survey the existing experimental literature, finding that significance and magnitude of gender differences are task specific and that gender differences appear in less than 10% of the studies and are significant but negligible in magnitude once all the data are pooled.
Journal ArticleDOI

A theoretical and experimental appraisal of four risk elicitation methods

TL;DR: The authors performed an in-depth comparison of four incentivized risk elicitation tasks and found that the task estimates vary over and above what can be explained by the simulations, and investigated the possibility the tasks elicit different types of preferences, rather than simply providing a different measure of the same preferences.
Journal ArticleDOI

The “bomb” risk elicitation task

TL;DR: The Bomb Risk Elicitation Task (BRET) as discussed by the authors ) is an intuitive procedure aimed at measuring risk attitudes, which requires minimal numeracy skills, avoids truncation of the data, allows the precise estimation of both risk aversion and risk seeking, and is not affected by the degree of loss aversion or violations of the Reduction Axiom.