scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Aris Christou published in 2012"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA) tool to identify the critical failure modes of the LEDs and their effects on the system (LED optical output in this context), their frequency of occurrence, severity and criticality of the failure modes.
Abstract: While use of LEDs in Fiber Optics and lighting applications is common, their use in medical diagnostic applications is not very extensive. Since the precise value of light intensity will be used to interpret patient results, understanding failure modes [1–4] is very important. We used the Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA) tool to identify the critical failure modes of the LEDs. FMECA involves identification of various failure modes, their effects on the system (LED optical output in this context), their frequency of occurrence, severity and the criticality of the failure modes. The competing failure modes/mechanisms were degradation of: active layer (where electron–hole recombination occurs to emit light), electrodes (provides electrical contact to the semiconductor chip), Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) surface layer (used to improve current spreading and light extraction), plastic encapsulation (protective polymer layer) and packaging failures (bond wires, heat sink separation). A FMECA table is constructed and the criticality is calculated by estimating the failure effect probability ( β ), failure mode ratio ( α ), failure rate ( λ ) and the operating time. Once the critical failure modes were identified, the next steps were generation of prior time to failure distribution and comparing with our accelerated life test data. To generate the prior distributions, data and results from previous investigations were utilized [5–33] where reliability test results of similar LEDs were reported. From the graphs or tabular data, we extracted the time required for the optical power output to reach 80% of its initial value. This is our failure criterion for the medical diagnostic application. Analysis of published data for different LED materials (AlGaInP, GaN, AlGaAs), the Semiconductor Structures (DH, MQW) and the mode of testing (DC, Pulsed) was carried out. The data was categorized according to the materials system and LED structure such as AlGaInP–DH–DC, AlGaInP–MQW–DC, GaN–DH–DC, and GaN–DH–DC. Although the reported testing was carried out at different temperature and current, the reported data was converted to the present application conditions of the medical environment. Comparisons between the model data and accelerated test results carried out in the present are reported. The use of accelerating agent modeling and regression analysis was also carried out. We have used the Inverse Power Law model with the current density J as the accelerating agent and the Arrhenius model with temperature as the accelerating agent. Finally, our reported methodology is presented as an approach for analyzing LED suitability for the target medical diagnostic applications.

15 citations


01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used the Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA) tool to identify the critical LED failure modes and the next step was the generation of time to failure distribution using Accelerated Life Testing (ALT) and Bayesian analysis.
Abstract: While use of LEDs in fiber optics and lighting applications is common, their use in medical diagnostic applications is very rare. Since the precise value of light intensity will be used to interpret patient results, understanding failure modes is very important. We used the Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA) tool to identify the critical LED failure modes. Once the critical failure modes were identified, the next step was the generation of time to failure distribution using Accelerated Life Testing (ALT) and Bayesian analysis. ALT was performed on the LEDs by driving them in pulse mode at higher current density J and higher temperature T. This required the use of accelerating agent modeling. We have used Inverse Power Law model with J as the accelerating agent and the Arrhenius model with T as the accelerating agent. Such power law dependence originates directly from the electromigration assumption of the failure mechanism, The Bayesian modeling began by researching published articles that can be used as prior information for Bayesian modeling. From the published data, we extracted the time required for the optical power output to reach 80% of its initial value (our failure criteria). Analysis of published data for different LED Materials (AlGaInP, GaN, AlGaAs), the Semiconductor Structures (DH, MQW) and the mode of testing (DC, Pulsed) was carried out. This data was converted to application conditions of the medical environment. Many of the LED degradation mechanisms occur simultaneously. The weakest link causes the actual failure. This leads us to believe that Weibull distribution is the most suitable distribution for time to failure of the LEDs. We used this rationale to develop the Bayesian likelihood function. In this study, we report the results of our ALT and develop the Bayesian model as an approach for analyzing LED suitability for numerous system applications.

1 citations