scispace - formally typeset
A

Axel J. Soto

Researcher at Universidad Nacional del Sur

Publications -  47
Citations -  365

Axel J. Soto is an academic researcher from Universidad Nacional del Sur. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Feature selection. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 44 publications receiving 279 citations. Previous affiliations of Axel J. Soto include Dalhousie University & University of Manchester.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Thalia: semantic search engine for biomedical abstracts.

TL;DR: Thalia is a semantic search engine that can recognize eight different types of concepts occurring in biomedical abstracts that is available via a web-based interface or a RESTful API.
Journal ArticleDOI

Multi-Objective Feature Selection in QSAR Using a Machine Learning Approach

TL;DR: Soto, Axel Juan, et al. as discussed by the authors, presented the Planta Piloto de Ingenieria Quimica (PILQ) for the first time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Visual analytics in cheminformatics: user-supervised descriptor selection for QSAR methods.

TL;DR: A software tool that combines statistical methods with interactive visualizations for choosing a set of descriptors for predicting a target property and allows the integration of a chemist’s expertise in the descriptor selection process with a low cognitive effort is proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Target-Driven Subspace Mapping Methods and Their Applicability Domain Estimation.

TL;DR: This two‐step approach represents an important contribution to the development of confident prediction tools in the chemoinformatics area, where the field is in need of both interpretable models and methods that estimate the confidence of predictions.
Journal ArticleDOI

When classification accuracy is not enough: Explaining news credibility assessment

TL;DR: The adapted neural classifier showed better performance on the test data than the stylometric classifier, despite the latter appearing to be easier to interpret by the participants, and users were significantly more accurate in their assessment after they interacted with the tool as well as more confident with their decisions.