Carbon nanotubes: opportunities and challenges

Tin doped indium oxide (ITO) films are highly transparent in the visible region, exhibiting high reflectance in the infrared region, and having nearly metallic conductivity. Owing to this unusual combination of electrical and optical properties, this material is widely applied in optoelectronic devices. The association of these properties in a single material explains the vast domain of its applicability and the diverse production methods which have emerged. Although the different properties of tin doped indium oxide in the film form are interdependent, this article mainly focuses on the electrical aspects. Detailed description of the conduction mechanism and the main parameters that control the conductivity is presented. On account of the large varieties and differences in the fabrication techniques, the electrical properties of ITO films are discussed and compared within each technique.

/pdf/tin-doped-indium-oxide-thin-films-electrical-properties-1emmfeswwg.pdf

Tin doped indium oxide thin films: Electrical properties

Microscopic view of epitaxial metal growth: nucleation and aggregation

Metal coating on suspended carbon nanotubes and its implication to metal–tube interaction

Electronic and atomic structure, and magnetism of transition-metal clusters.

We present a quantitative study of the diffusion of spherical antimony clusters deposited on graphite surfaces. The experimental structures obtained during deposition are compared to predictions of recent computer models, and very good agreement is found. From this comparison we can obtain the diffusion coefficient of large antimony clusters containing around 2300 atoms moving on a graphite substrate: we find ${D\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}D}_{0}\mathrm{exp}({\ensuremath{-}E}_{a}/{k}_{B}T)$ with ${D}_{0}\ensuremath{\approx}1.6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{4}{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}/\mathrm{s}$ and ${E}_{a}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}0.7\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.1\mathrm{eV}$. This large value of ${D}_{0}$ suggests that the diffusion cannot be explained by a simple atomic activated process, but may rather involve collective motions of the atoms of the cluster.

Experimental observation of fast diffusion of large antimony clusters on graphite surfaces.

Diffusion and aggregation of large antimony and gold clusters deposited on graphite

Cluster-beam deposition of thin metallic antimony films: Cluster-size and deposition-rate effects.

Barium clusters are produced by the inert-gas condensation technique. The observed size distribution shows large peaks at n=13, 19, 23, 26, 29, 32, as well for singly charged clusters as for doubly and triply charged clusters. These results can be interpreted by icosahedral close-packing structures, similar to those observed in noble-gas clusters.

Close-packing structure of small barium clusters

Antimony clusters are produced by the gas aggregation method. They are found to be built from Sb4 units. The Sb+4n clusters are demonstrated to relax their excess energy by evaporation of a tetramer and the binding energy of Sb4 in the cluster is measured to be about 1.3 eV, well below the binding energy of a Sb atom in the bulk (≊2.75 eV). The ionization potentials of Sb4n clusters are studied as a function of the size and the observed evolution confirms the nonmetallic character of their structure. These results are compared with those obtained for bismuth clusters which exhibit a very different behavior. Finally the possible metastable character of Sb4n structure is discussed and illustrated by experiments performed as a function of inert gas temperature in the clusters source.

B. Cabaud

Papers

Experimental observation of fast diffusion of large antimony clusters on graphite surfaces.

Diffusion and aggregation of large antimony and gold clusters deposited on graphite

Cluster-beam deposition of thin metallic antimony films: Cluster-size and deposition-rate effects.

Close-packing structure of small barium clusters

Binding energy and electronic properties in antimony clusters: Comparison with bismuth clusters