The authors review a range of evidence concerning the motivational underpinnings of anger as an affect, with particular reference to the relationship between anger and anxiety or fear. The evidence supports the view that anger relates to an appetitive or approach motivational system, whereas anxiety relates to an aversive or avoidance motivational system. This evidence appears to have 2 implications. One implication concerns the nature of anterior cortical asymmetry effects. The evidence suggests that such asymmetry reflects direction of motivational engagement (approach vs. withdrawal) rather than affective valence. The other implication concerns the idea that affects form a purely positive dimension and a purely negative dimension, which reflect the operation of appetitive and aversive motivational systems, respectively. The evidence reviewed does not support that view. The evidence is, however, consistent with a discrete-emotions view (which does not rely on dimensionality) and with an alternative dimensional approach.

/pdf/anger-is-an-approach-related-affect-evidence-and-ce7dbmul66.pdf

Anger Is an Approach-Related Affect: Evidence and Implications.

Recent evidence in natural and semi-natural settings has revealed a variety of left-right perceptual asymmetries among ver- tebrates These include preferential use of the left or right visual hemifield during activities such as searching for food, agonistic re- sponses, or escape from predators in animals as different as fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals There are obvious disad- vantages in showing such directional asymmetries because relevant stimuli may be located to the animal's left or right at rando m; there is no a priori association between the meaning of a stimulus (eg, its being a predator or a food item) and its being located to the ani- mal's left or right Moreover, other organisms (eg, predators) could exploit the predictability of behavior that arises from population- level lateral biases It might be argued that lateralization of function enhances cognitive capacity and efficiency of the brain, thus coun- teracting the ecological disadvantages of lateral biases in behavior However, such an increase in brain efficiency could be obtained by each individual being lateralized without any need to align the direction of the asymmetry in the majority of the individuals of the pop- ulation Here we argue that the alignment of the direction of behavioral asymmetries at the population level arises as an "evolutionarily stable strategy" under "social" pressures occurring when individually asymmetrical organisms must coordinate their behavior with the behavior of other asymmetrical organisms of the same or different species

/pdf/survival-with-an-asymmetrical-brain-advantages-and-4nfldlpjsp.pdf

Survival with an asymmetrical brain: Advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization

All animals evaluate the salience of external stimuli and integrate them with internal physiological information into adaptive behavior. Natural and sexual selection impinge on these processes, yet our understanding of behavioral decision-making mechanisms and their evolution is still very limited. Insights from mammals indicate that two neural circuits are of crucial importance in this context: the social behavior network and the mesolimbic reward system. Here we review evidence from neurochemical, tract-tracing, developmental, and functional lesion/stimulation studies that delineates homology relationships for most of the nodes of these two circuits across the five major vertebrate lineages: mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and teleost fish. We provide for the first time a comprehensive comparative analysis of the two neural circuits and conclude that they were already present in early vertebrates. We also propose that these circuits form a larger social decision-making (SDM) network that regulates adaptive behavior. Our synthesis thus provides an important foundation for understanding the evolution of the neural mechanisms underlying reward processing and behavioral regulation. J. Comp. Neurol. 519:3599–3639, 2011.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cne.22735

The Vertebrate mesolimbic reward system and social behavior network: A comparative synthesis

http://apsychoserver.psych.arizona.edu/JJBAReprints/PSYC501A/Readings/Harmon-Jones%20Gable%20Peterson%20Bio%20Psychology%202010.pdf

The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: a review and update.

Behavioral ecologists and economists emphasize that potential costs, as well as rewards, influence decision making. Although neuroscientists assume that frontal areas are central to decision making, the evidence is contradictory and the critical region remains unclear. Here it is shown that frontal lobe contributions to cost-benefit decision making can be understood by positing the existence of two independent systems that make decisions about delay and effort costs. Anterior cingulate cortex lesions affected how much effort rats decided to invest for rewards. Orbitofrontal cortical lesions affected how long rats decided to wait for rewards. The pattern of disruption suggested the deficit could be related to impaired associative learning. Impairments of the two systems may underlie apathetic and impulsive choice patterns in neurological and psychiatric illnesses. Although the existence of two systems is not predicted by economic accounts of decision making, our results suggest that delay and effort may exert distinct influences on decision making.

Separate neural pathways process different decision costs

https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(00)00671-0.pdf

Asymmetry pays: visual lateralization improves discrimination success in pigeons

http://www.bio.psy.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/papers/Kalenscher%20et%20al%202005.pdf

Single Units in the Pigeon Brain Integrate Reward Amount and Time-to-Reward in an Impulsive Choice Task

https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(05)00504-X.pdf

A left-sided visuospatial bias in birds

Working memory, the ability to temporarily store and manipulate currently relevant information, is required for most cognitive faculties. In humans and other mammals, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) provides the underlying neural network for these processes. Within the PFC, working memory neurons display sustained elevated activity while holding active an internal representation of the relevant stimulus during its physical absence or retaining a motor plan for the forthcoming response. Working memory, however, is not a hallmark of higher vertebrates endowed with a neocortex. Birds also master complex cognitive problems invoking working memory, but they lack a laminated neocortex. Behavioral studies in pigeons show that the neostriatum caudolaterale (NCL) plays a central role in executive functions, such as working memory and response control. For neurons in the NCL of pigeons, we show activity changes during the delay of a working memory task, which were similar to those observed in PFC neurons and were related to the successful holding of information in memory and to the subsequent behavior. Thus, although the anatomical and morphological structure of the neuronal substrate in birds is radically different from the mammalian neocortical architecture, the neuronal mechanisms evolved to master equivalent cognitive demands seem to be very similar.

https://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/22/4/RC210.full.pdf

Bettina Diekamp

Papers

Asymmetry pays: visual lateralization improves discrimination success in pigeons

Single Units in the Pigeon Brain Integrate Reward Amount and Time-to-Reward in an Impulsive Choice Task

A left-sided visuospatial bias in birds

Working Memory Neurons in Pigeons

Embryonic light stimulation induces different asymmetries in visuoperceptual and visuomotor pathways of pigeons.