scispace - formally typeset
B

Brad Lundahl

Researcher at University of Utah

Publications -  37
Citations -  4879

Brad Lundahl is an academic researcher from University of Utah. The author has contributed to research in topics: Motivational interviewing & Poison control. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 31 publications receiving 4402 citations. Previous affiliations of Brad Lundahl include Northern Illinois University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A meta-analysis of parent training: moderators and follow-up effects.

TL;DR: A meta-analysis of 63 peer-reviewed studies evaluated the ability of parent training programs to modify disruptive child behaviors and parental behavior and perceptions, finding parent training was least effective for economically disadvantaged families.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Meta-Analysis of Motivational Interviewing: Twenty-Five Years of Empirical Studies.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the unique contribution motivational interviewing (MI) has on counseling outcomes and how MI compares with other interventions, and found that MI is more effective than other interventions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

TL;DR: Motivational Interviewing was robust across moderators such as delivery location and patient characteristics, and appears efficacious when delivered in brief consultations and could be used for a wide range of behavioral issues in health care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Animal-assisted therapy: a meta-analysis

TL;DR: Overall, AAT was associated with moderate effect sizes in improving outcomes in four areas: Autism-spectrum symptoms, medical difficulties, behavioral problems, and emotional well-being.
Journal ArticleDOI

The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses.

TL;DR: This article reviews the research support for Motivational interviewing so that practitioners can make informed decisions about the value and applicability of MI in their clinical work and highlights the evidence from the three published meta-analyses.