C
Charles Jochim
Researcher at IBM
Publications - 38
Citations - 489
Charles Jochim is an academic researcher from IBM. The author has contributed to research in topics: Automatic summarization & Scientific literature. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 38 publications receiving 349 citations. Previous affiliations of Charles Jochim include Indiana University & University of Stuttgart.
Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Identification of Tasks, Datasets, Evaluation Metrics, and Numeric Scores for Scientific Leaderboards Construction
TL;DR: This model is a first step towards automatic leaderboard construction, e.g., in the NLP domain, aimed at automatically extracting task, dataset, metric and score from NLP papers, towards the automatic construction of leaderboards.
Journal ArticleDOI
An autonomous debating system.
Noam Slonim,Yonatan Bilu,Carlos Alzate,Roy Bar-Haim,Ben Bogin,Francesca Bonin,Leshem Choshen,Edo Cohen-Karlik,Lena Dankin,Lilach Edelstein,Liat Ein-Dor,Roni Friedman-Melamed,Assaf Gavron,Ariel Gera,Martin Gleize,Shai Gretz,Dan Gutfreund,Alon Halfon,Daniel Hershcovich,Ron Hoory,Yufang Hou,Shay Hummel,Michal Jacovi,Charles Jochim,Yoav Kantor,Yoav Katz,David Konopnicki,Zvi Kons,Lili Kotlerman,Dalia Krieger,Dan Lahav,Tamar Lavee,Ran Levy,Naftali Liberman,Yosi Mass,Amir Menczel,Shachar Mirkin,Guy Moshkowich,Shila Ofek-Koifman,Matan Orbach,Ella Rabinovich,Ruty Rinott,Slava Shechtman,Dafna Sheinwald,Eyal Shnarch,Ilya Shnayderman,Aya Soffer,Artem Spector,Benjamin Sznajder,Assaf Toledo,Orith Toledo-Ronen,Elad Venezian,Ranit Aharonov +52 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present Project Debater, an autonomous debating system that can engage in a competitive debate with humans, and provide a complete description of the system's architecture, a thorough and systematic evaluation of its operation across a wide range of debate topics.
Proceedings Article
Towards a Generic and Flexible Citation Classifier Based on a Faceted Classification Scheme
Charles Jochim,Hinrich Sch"utze +1 more
TL;DR: This work uses a standard classification scheme for citations that was developed independently of automatic classification and therefore is not bound to any particular citation application, and introduces new features designed for citation classification and compares them experimentally with previously proposed citation features, showing that these new features improve classification accuracy.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Improving Claim Stance Classification with Lexical Knowledge Expansion and Context Utilization
TL;DR: This work shows that both accuracy and coverage can be significantly improved through automatic expansion of the initial lexicon, and developed a set of contextual features that further improves the state-of-the-art for this task.
Journal ArticleDOI
End-to-End Argumentation Knowledge Graph Construction
TL;DR: This paper studies the end-to-end construction of an argumentation knowledge graph that is intended to support argument synthesis, argumentative question answering, or fake news detection, among others.