C
Clark A. Chinn
Researcher at Rutgers University
Publications - 89
Citations - 8714
Clark A. Chinn is an academic researcher from Rutgers University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Science education & Argumentation theory. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 86 publications receiving 7961 citations. Previous affiliations of Clark A. Chinn include Kyoto University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that problem-based learning (PBL) and inquiry learning (IL) are powerful and effective models of learning and that they employ scaffolding extensively, thereby reducing the cognitive load and allowing students to learn in complex domains.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction
Clark A. Chinn,William F. Brewer +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a detailed analysis of the ways in which scientists and science students respond to anomalous data is presented, giving special attention to the factors that make theory change more likely.
Journal ArticleDOI
Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks in terms of how similar they are to authentic science and identify the respects in which these reasoning tasks are similar to and different from real scientific research.
Journal ArticleDOI
Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology
TL;DR: In this article, a philosophically grounded framework for epistemic cognition is proposed, which includes five components: epistemic aims and epistemic value, the structure of knowledge and other epistemic achievements, the sources and justification of knowledge, and the related epistemic stances; epistemic virtues and vices; and reliable and unreliable processes for achieving epistemic goals.
Journal ArticleDOI
Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the effects of two instructional frames for discussion, traditional Recitations and an alternative to Recitations called Collaborative Reasoning, on patterns of discourse in fourth grade literature discussions.