scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Colin J Crooks published in 2016"


Journal ArticleDOI
18 Feb 2016-Blood
TL;DR: Women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer have a clinically important risk of venous thromboembolism, whereas an increased risk of VTE immediately after endocrine therapy is restricted to tamoxifen.

84 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To determine the prevalence and pattern of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescription and the practices employed to reduce PPI use in the UK general population, a large number of patients were prescribed PPI.
Abstract: Purpose: To determine the prevalence and pattern of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescription and the practices employed to reduce PPI use in the UK general population. Methods: The UK's Clinical Practice Research Database was used to identify individuals who were issued with ≥1 PPI prescription during the period 1990–2014. Point and period prevalence of PPI use were estimated annually. Additionally, new users of PPI therapy who had 5 years of follow-up data were included in a cohort analysis to describe patterns of cessation and duration of PPI use. Results: Both the period and point prevalence of PPI use increased between 1990 and 2014 (period prevalence increased from 0.2 to 15.0% and point from 0.03 to 7.7%). A total of 596 334 new users of PPI therapy in the cohort study received 8 784 272 prescriptions. Of these, 26.7% used PPI therapy long term (≥1 year continuously), while 3.9% remained on PPI therapy for 5 years. Clear attempts to step down dose were identified in 39.9% of long-term users, while this was 47% in patients whose initial indication did not mandate long-term use. Conclusion: A considerable increase in PPI use was observed in UK general practice. Of long-term PPI users, 60% did not have an attempt to discontinue or step down. Considerable opportunities may therefore exist to reduce the cost and side effects of PPI use through improving adherence to recommended withdrawal strategies.

82 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
15 Nov 2016-BMJ
TL;DR: The association between the use of PPIs and risk of community acquired pneumonia is likely to be due entirely to confounding factors.
Abstract: Objective To examine the risk of community acquired pneumonia before and after prescription of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and assess whether unmeasured confounding explains this association. Design Cohort study and self controlled case series. Setting Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1990 to 2013) in UK. Participants Adult patients with a new prescription for a PPI individually matched with controls. Main outcome measures Association of community acquired pneumonia with PPI prescription estimated by three methods: a multivariable Cox model comparing risk in PPI exposed patients with controls, corrected for potential confounders; a self controlled case series; and a prior event rate ratio (PERR) analysis over the 12 month periods before and after the first PPI prescription. Results 160 000 new PPI users were examined. The adjusted Cox regression showed a risk of community acquired pneumonia 1.67 (95% confidence interval 1.55 to 1.79) times higher for patients exposed to PPI than for controls. In the self controlled case series, among 48 451 PPI exposed patients with a record of community acquired pneumonia, the incidence rate ratio was 1.19 (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.25) in the 30 days after PPI prescription but was higher in the 30 days before a PPI prescription (1.92, 1.84 to 2.00). The Cox regressions for prior event rate ratio similarly showed a greater increase in community acquired pneumonia in the year before than the year after PPI prescription, such that the analysis showed a reduced relative risk of pneumonia associated with PPI use (prior event rate ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.99). Conclusion The association between the use of PPIs and risk of community acquired pneumonia is likely to be due entirely to confounding factors.

68 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Patients with coeliac disease are considered as individuals for whom pneumococcal vaccination is advocated.
Abstract: Background: Patients with coeliac disease are considered as individuals for whom pneumococcal vaccination is advocated. Aim: To quantify the risk of community-acquired pneumonia among patients with coeliac disease, assessing whether vaccination against streptococcal pneumonia modified this risk. Methods: We identified all patients with coeliac disease within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked with English Hospital Episodes Statistics between April 1997 and March 2011 and up to 10 controls per patient with coeliac disease frequency matched in 10-year age bands. Absolute rates of community-acquired pneumonia were calculated for patients with coeliac disease compared to controls stratified by vaccination status and time of diagnosis using Cox regression in terms of adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Results: Among 9803 patients with coeliac disease and 101 755 controls, respectively, there were 179 and 1864 first community-acquired pneumonia events. Overall absolute rate of pneumonia was similar in patients with coeliac disease and controls: 3.42 and 3.12 per 1000 person-years respectively (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.91–1.24). However, we found a 28% increased risk of pneumonia in coeliac disease unvaccinated subjects compared to unvaccinated controls (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02–1.60). This increased risk was limited to those younger than 65, was highest around the time of diagnosis and was maintained for more than 5 years after diagnosis. Only 26.6% underwent vaccination after their coeliac disease diagnosis. Conclusions: Unvaccinated patients with coeliac disease under the age of 65 have an excess risk of community-acquired pneumonia that was not found in vaccinated patients with coeliac disease. As only a minority of patients with coeliac disease are being vaccinated there is a missed opportunity to intervene to protect these patients from pneumonia.

38 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
27 Oct 2016-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: The use of linked population based primary and secondary care data developed a co-morbidity score that had improved discrimination, particularly in younger age groups, and had a greater effect when adjusting for co- Morbidity than existing scores.
Abstract: Background: We have assessed whether the linkage between routine primary and secondary care records provided an opportunity to develop an improved population based co-morbidity score with the combined information on co-morbidities from both health care settings Methods: We extracted all people older than 20 years at the start of 2005 within the linkage between the Hospital Episodes Statistics, Clinical Practice Research Datalink, and Office for National Statistics death register in England A random 50% sample was used to identify relevant diagnostic codes using a Bayesian hierarchy to share information between similar Read and ICD 10 code groupings Internal validation of the score was performed in the remaining 50% and discrimination was assessed using Harrell’s C statistic Comparisons were made over time, age, and consultation rate with the Charlson and Elixhauser indexes Results: 657,264 people were followed up from the 1st January 2005 98 groupings of codes were derived from the Bayesian hierarchy, and 37 had an adjusted weighting of greater than zero in the Cox proportional hazards model 11 of these groupings had a different weighting dependent on whether they were coded from hospital or primary care The C statistic reduced from 088 (95% confidence interval 088–088) in the first year of follow up, to 085 (085–085) including all 5 years When we stratified the linked score by consultation rate the association with mortality remained consistent, but there was a significant interaction with age, with improved discrimination and fit in those under 50 years old (C=085, 083–087) compared to the Charlson (C=079, 077–082) or Elixhauser index (C=081, 079–083) Conclusions: The use of linked population based primary and secondary care data developed a co-morbidity score that had improved discrimination, particularly in younger age groups, and had a greater effect when adjusting for co-morbidity than existing scores

4 citations