Essential oils are aromatic and volatile liquids extracted from plants. The chemicals in essential oils are secondary metabolites, which play an important role in plant defense as they often possess antimicrobial properties. The interest in essential oils and their application in food preservation has been amplified in recent years by an increasingly negative consumer perception of synthetic preservatives. Furthermore, food-borne diseases are a growing public health problem worldwide, calling for more effective preservation strategies. The antibacterial properties of essential oils and their constituents have been documented extensively. Pioneering work has also elucidated the mode of action of a few essential oil constituents, but detailed knowledge about most of the compounds’ mode of action is still lacking. This knowledge is particularly important to predict their effect on different microorganisms, how they interact with food matrix components, and how they work in combination with other antimicrobial compounds. The main obstacle for using essential oil constituents as food preservatives is that they are most often not potent enough as single components, and they cause negative organoleptic effects when added in sufficient amounts to provide an antimicrobial effect. Exploiting synergies between several compounds has been suggested as a solution to this problem. However, little is known about which interactions lead to synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects. Such knowledge could contribute to design of new and more potent antimicrobial blends, and to understand the interplay between the constituents of crude essential oils. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of current knowledge about the antibacterial properties and antibacterial mode of action of essential oils and their constituents, and to identify research avenues that can facilitate implementation of essential oils as natural preservatives in foods.

/pdf/essential-oils-in-food-preservation-mode-of-action-synergies-26gwz54pww.pdf

Essential oils in food preservation: mode of action, synergies, and interactions with food matrix components.

Current applications and new opportunities for the use of pulsed electric fields in food science and industry

Effect of thermal and non thermal processing technologies on the bioactive content of exotic fruits and their products: Review of recent advances

The increasing consumer demand for 'fresh-like' foods has led to much research effort in the last 20 years to develop new mild methods for food preservation. Nonthermal methods allow micro-organisms to be inactivated at sublethal temperatures thus better preserving the sensory, nutritional and functional properties of foods. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the microbiological aspects of the most relevant nonthermal technologies for microbial inactivation currently under study, including irradiation, high hydrostatic pressure, pulsed electric field and ultrasound under pressure. Topics covered are the mechanisms of inactivation, sensitivity of different microbial groups and factors affecting it and kinetics of inactivation.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02561.x

Microbial inactivation by new technologies of food preservation.

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP), pulsed electric fields (PEFs), ultrasound (US), and cold plasma (CP) are emerging technologies that have already found application in the food industry or related sectors. This review aims to describe the basic principles of these nonthermal technologies as well as the state of the art concerning their impact on biological cells, enzymes, and food constituents. Current and potential applications will be discussed, focusing on process-structure-function relationships, as well as recent advances in the process development.

Emerging Technologies in Food Processing

Chemical composition of commercial citrus fruit essential oils and evaluation of their antimicrobial activity acting alone or in combined processes

Aims: The aim was to evaluate (i) the resistance of Escherichia coli BJ4 to citral in a buffer system as a function of citral concentration, treatment medium pH, storage time and initial inoculum size, (ii) the role of the sigma factor RpoS on citral resistance of E. coli, (iii) the role of the cell envelope damage in the mechanism of microbial inactivation by citral and (iiii) possible synergistic effects of mild heat treatment and pulsed electric fields (PEF) treatment combined with citral.



Methods and Results:  The initial inoculum size greatly affected the efficacy of citral against E. coli cells. Exposure to 200 μl l−1 of citral at pH 4·0 for 24 h at 20°C caused the inactivation of more than 5 log10 cycles of cells starting at an inoculum size of 106 or 107 CFU ml−1, whereas increasing the cell concentration to 109 CFU ml−1 caused <1 log10 cycle of inactivation. Escherichia coli showed higher resistance to citral at pH 4·0 than pH 7·0. The rpoS null mutant strain E. coli BJ4L1 was less resistant to citral than the wild-type strain. Occurrence of sublethal injury to both the cytoplasmic and outer membranes was demonstrated by adding sodium chloride or bile salts to the recovery media. The majority of sublethally injured cells by citral required energy and lipid synthesis for repair. A strongly synergistic lethal effect was shown by mild heat treatment combined with citral but the presence of citral during the application of a PEF treatment did not show any advantage.



Conclusions:  This work confirms that cell envelope damage is an important event in citral inactivation of bacteria, and it describes the key factors on the inactivation of E. coli cells by citral.



Significance and Impact of the Study:  Knowledge about the mechanism of microbial inactivation by citral helps establish successful combined preservation treatments.

Inactivation of Escherichia coli by citral

Pulsed electric fields cause bacterial envelopes permeabilization depending on the treatment intensity, the treatment medium pH and the microorganism investigated

Aims: The objective was to investigate the occurrence of sublethal injury after pulsed electric field (PEF) depending on the treatment time, the electric field strength and the pH of the treatment media in two Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis ssp. niger, Listeria monocytogenes) and six Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella serotype Senftenberg 775W, Salmonella serotype Typhimurium, Yersinia enterocolitica) bacterial strains.



Methods and Results:  A characteristic behaviour was observed for the Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria studied. Whereas Gram-positive bacteria showed a higher PEF resistance at pH 7·0, the Gram-negative were more resistant at pH 4·0. In these conditions, in which bacteria showed their maximum resistance, a large proportion of sublethally injured cells were detected. In most cases, the longer the treatment time and the higher the electric field applied, the greater the proportion of sublethally injured cells that were detected. No sublethal injury was detected when Gram-positive bacteria were treated at pH 4·0 and Gram-negative at pH 7·0.



Conclusions:  Sublethal injury was detected after PEF so, bacterial inactivation by PEF is not an ‘all or nothing’ event.



Significance and Impact of the Study:  This work could be useful for improving food preservation by PEF.

Occurrence of sublethal injury after pulsed electric fields depending on the micro-organism, the treatment medium ph and the intensity of the treatment investigated

The objective was to evaluate and compare the pulsed electric field (PEF) resistance of four Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis, Listeria monocytogenes, Lactobacillus plantarum, Staphylococcus aureus) and four Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella serotype Senftenberg 775W, Yersinia enterocolitica) bacterial strains under the same treatment conditions. Microbial characteristics such as cell size, shape or type of the cell envelopes did not exert the expected influence on microbial PEF resistance. The most PEF resistant bacteria depended on the treatment medium pH. For instance, L. monocytogenes, which showed the highest PEF resistance at pH 7.0, was one of the most sensitive at pH 4.0. The most PEF resistant strains at pH 4.0 were the Gram-negatives E. coli O157:H7 and S. Senftenberg. A subsequent holding of PEF-treated cells in pH 4.0 for 2 h increased the degree of inactivation up to 4 extra Log10 cycles depending on the bacterial strain investigated. Under these treatment conditions, the most PEF resistant bacterial strains were still the pathogens S. Senftenberg and E. coli O157:H7. Industrial relevance The design of appropriate food preservation processes by PEF requires the selection of an adequate target bacterial strain, which should correspond to the most PEF resistant microorganism contaminating food. This study indicates that the pH of the treatment medium plays an important role in determining this target bacterial strain. On the other hand, the combination of PEF and subsequent holding under acidic conditions has been proven to be an effective method in order to achieve a higher level of microbial inactivation.

D. García

Papers

Chemical composition of commercial citrus fruit essential oils and evaluation of their antimicrobial activity acting alone or in combined processes

Inactivation of Escherichia coli by citral

Pulsed electric fields cause bacterial envelopes permeabilization depending on the treatment intensity, the treatment medium pH and the microorganism investigated

Occurrence of sublethal injury after pulsed electric fields depending on the micro-organism, the treatment medium ph and the intensity of the treatment investigated

Bacterial resistance after pulsed electric fields depending on the treatment medium pH