scispace - formally typeset
D

Dan Jurafsky

Researcher at Stanford University

Publications -  348
Citations -  50756

Dan Jurafsky is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Language model & Parsing. The author has an hindex of 93, co-authored 344 publications receiving 44536 citations. Previous affiliations of Dan Jurafsky include Carnegie Mellon University & University of Colorado Boulder.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Citation-based bootstrapping for large-scale author disambiguation

TL;DR: A new, two-stage, self-supervised algorithm for author disambiguation in large bibliographic databases that shares the advantages of unsupervised approaches (no need for expensive hand labels) as well as supervised approaches (a rich set of features that can be discriminatively trained).
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Accent detection and speech recognition for Shanghai-accented Mandarin.

TL;DR: A new approach that combines accent detection, accent discriminative acoustic features, acoustic adaptation and model selection for accented Chinese speech recognition is proposed and experimental results show that this approach can improve the recognition of accented speech.
Proceedings Article

Learning to Merge Word Senses

TL;DR: A discriminative classifier is trained over a wide variety of features derived from WordNet structure, corpus-based evidence, and evidence from other lexical resources, and a learned similarity measure outperforms previously proposed automatic methods for sense clustering on the task of predicting human sense merging judgments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Narrative framing of consumer sentiment in online restaurant reviews

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that portraying the self, whether as well–educated, as a victim, or even as addicted to chocolate, is a key function of reviews and suggests the important role of online reviews in exploring social psychological variables.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Analyzing polarization in social media: Method and application to tweets on 21 mass shootings

TL;DR: This article provided an NLP framework to uncover four linguistic dimensions of political polarization in social media: topic choice, framing, affect and illocutionary force, and found evidence that the discussion of these events is highly polarized politically and that this polarization is primarily driven by partisan differences in framing rather than topic choice.