scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel Olsen

Researcher at University of Washington

Publications -  28
Citations -  929

Daniel Olsen is an academic researcher from University of Washington. The author has contributed to research in topics: Demand response & Peak demand. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 27 publications receiving 696 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel Olsen include Washington University in St. Louis & Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Demand Response for Ancillary Services

TL;DR: This work describes and implements a methodology to construct detailed temporal and spatial representations of demand response resources and to incorporate those resources into power system models and demonstrates how the combination of these three analyses can be used to assess economic value of the realizable potential ofDemand response for ancillary services.
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimal Carbon Taxes for Emissions Targets in the Electricity Sector

TL;DR: In this paper, the Weighted sum bisection method is used to determine the lowest emission tax rate that can reduce the anticipated emissions of the power sector below a prescribed, regulatorily defined target.
ReportDOI

Grid Integration of Aggregated Demand Response, Part 2: Modeling Demand Response in a Production Cost Model

TL;DR: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOEIA) Demand Response and Energy Storage Integration Study as mentioned in this paper is a multinational laboratory effort to assess the potential value of demand response (DR) and energy storage to electricity systems with different penetration levels of variable renewable resources and to improve our understanding of associated markets and institutions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Co-Optimization of Distribution Transformer Aging and Energy Arbitrage Using Electric Vehicles

TL;DR: This paper proposes a centralized model to co-optimize the transformer loss-of-life with the benefits for EVs’ owners on charging/discharging management and shows the benefit of the centralized strategy in maintaining the grid assets, while modestly reducing consumers’ arbitrage benefits.
Journal ArticleDOI

Planning Low-Carbon Campus Energy Hubs

TL;DR: This paper presents four frameworks for incentivizing energy hub equipment investments for low-carbon operation targets, and compares the cost of less efficient institutional frameworks with the most efficient approach, i.e., cooperation between builder and operator with constraints on emissions.