scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel S. Wilks

Researcher at Cornell University

Publications -  118
Citations -  15683

Daniel S. Wilks is an academic researcher from Cornell University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Precipitation & Ensemble forecasting. The author has an hindex of 41, co-authored 117 publications receiving 14871 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel S. Wilks include Oregon State University.

Papers
More filters
Book

Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences

TL;DR: The second edition of "Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, Second Edition" as mentioned in this paper presents and explains techniques used in atmospheric data summarization, analysis, testing, and forecasting.
Journal ArticleDOI

The weather generation game: a review of stochastic weather models

TL;DR: The historical development of statistical weather models, from simple analyses of runs of consecutive rainy and dry days at single sites, through to multisite models of daily precipitation, can be found in this article.
Journal ArticleDOI

Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: A comparison of methods

TL;DR: In this article, a range of different statistical downscaling models was calibrated using both observed and general circulation model (GCM) generated daily precipitation time series and intercompared.
Journal ArticleDOI

Multisite generalization of a daily stochastic precipitation generation model

TL;DR: In this article, the chain-dependent process stochastic model of daily precipitation is extended to simultaneous simulation at multiple locations by driving a collection of individual models with serially independent but spatially correlated random numbers.
Journal ArticleDOI

“The Stippling Shows Statistically Significant Grid Points”: How Research Results are Routinely Overstated and Overinterpreted, and What to Do about It

TL;DR: This paper reviews the history of the multiple-testing issue within the atmospheric sciences literature and illustrates a statistically principled and computationally easy approach to dealing with it—namely, control of the false discovery rate.