scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel Westreich

Researcher at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Publications -  181
Citations -  7378

Daniel Westreich is an academic researcher from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Pregnancy. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 165 publications receiving 5492 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel Westreich include Duke University & University of the Witwatersrand.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider

TL;DR: This work provides two hypothetical examples to convey concepts underlying bias due to conditioning on a collider, or collider-stratification, bias, which is a common effect of a genotype and an environmental factor.
Journal ArticleDOI

Doubly Robust Estimation of Causal Effects

TL;DR: The authors present a conceptual overview of doubly robust estimation, a simple worked example, results from a simulation study examining performance of estimated and bootstrapped standard errors, and a discussion of the potential advantages and limitations of this method.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Table 2 Fallacy: Presenting and Interpreting Confounder and Modifier Coefficients

TL;DR: Suggestions are offered to limit potential misunderstandings when multiple effect estimates are presented, including precise distinction between total and direct effect measures from a single model, and use of multiple models tailored to yield total-effect estimates for covariates.
Journal ArticleDOI

Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression

TL;DR: Boosting and, to a lesser extent, decision trees appear to be most promising for use in the context of propensity score analysis, but extensive simulation studies are needed to establish their utility in practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Invited Commentary: Positivity in Practice

TL;DR: In this article, the authors define positivity, distinguish between deterministic and random positivity and discuss the 2 relevant papers in this issue, and illustrate positivity in simple 2 × 2 tables, as well as detail some ways in which epidemiologists may examine their data for non-positivity and deal with violations of positivity.