scispace - formally typeset
D

David Denyer

Researcher at Cranfield University

Publications -  74
Citations -  23553

David Denyer is an academic researcher from Cranfield University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Evidence-based management & Organizational learning. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 73 publications receiving 18109 citations. Previous affiliations of David Denyer include Queen's University Belfast.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review

TL;DR: The extent to which the process of systematic review can be applied to the management field in order to produce a reliable knowledge stock and enhanced practice by developing context-sensitive research is evaluated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate the process of systematic review used in the medical sciences to produce a reliable knowledge stock and enhanced practice by developing context-sensitive research and highlight the challenges in developing an appropriate methodology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence

TL;DR: A systematic review of research linking the networking behavior of firms with their innovative capacity is presented in this paper, where the authors find that the principal benefits of networking as identified in the literature include, risk sharing; obtaining access to new markets and technologies; speeding products to market; pooling complementary skills; safeguarding property rights when complete or contingent contracts are not possible.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sustainability‐oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review

TL;DR: In this article, a review of 100 scholarly articles and 27 grey sources drawn from the period of the three Earth Summits (1992, 2002 and 2012), the authors address four specific deficiencies that have given rise to these limitations: the meaning of SOI, how it has been conceptualized, its treatment as a dichotomous phenomenon and a general failure to reflect more contemporary practices.