Institution
Cranfield University
Education•Cranfield, United Kingdom•
About: Cranfield University is a education organization based out in Cranfield, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Context (language use) & Supply chain. The organization has 10025 authors who have published 21130 publications receiving 678277 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
•
TL;DR: The extent to which the process of systematic review can be applied to the management field in order to produce a reliable knowledge stock and enhanced practice by developing context-sensitive research is evaluated.
Abstract: Undertaking a review of the literature is an important part of any research project. The researcher both maps and assesses the relevant intellectual territory in order to specify a research question which will further develop the knowledge base. However, traditional 'narrative' reviews frequently lack thoroughness, and in many cases are not undertaken as genuine pieces of investigatory science. Consequently they can lack a means for making sense of what the collection of studies is saying. These reviews can be biased by the researcher and often lack rigour. Furthermore, the use of reviews of the available evidence to provide insights and guidance for intervention into operational needs of practitioners and policymakers has largely been of secondary importance. For practitioners, making sense of a mass of often-contradictory evidence has become progressively harder. The quality of evidence underpinning decision-making and action has been questioned, for inadequate or incomplete evidence seriously impedes policy formulation and implementation. In exploring ways in which evidence-informed management reviews might be achieved, the authors evaluate the process of systematic review used in the medical sciences. Over the last fifteen years, medical science has attempted to improve the review process by synthesizing research in a systematic, transparent, and reproducible manner with the twin aims of enhancing the knowledge base and informing policymaking and practice. This paper evaluates the extent to which the process of systematic review can be applied to the management field in order to produce a reliable knowledge stock and enhanced practice by developing context-sensitive research. The paper highlights the challenges in developing an appropriate methodology.
7,368 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate the process of systematic review used in the medical sciences to produce a reliable knowledge stock and enhanced practice by developing context-sensitive research and highlight the challenges in developing an appropriate methodology.
Abstract: Undertaking a review of the literature is an important part of any research project. The researcher both maps and assesses the relevant intellectual territory in order to specify a research question which will further develop the knowledge hase. However, traditional 'narrative' reviews frequently lack thoroughness, and in many cases are not undertaken as genuine pieces of investigatory science. Consequently they can lack a means for making sense of what the collection of studies is saying. These reviews can he hiased by the researcher and often lack rigour. Furthermore, the use of reviews of the available evidence to provide insights and guidance for intervention into operational needs of practitioners and policymakers has largely been of secondary importance. For practitioners, making sense of a mass of often-contrad ictory evidence has hecome progressively harder. The quality of evidence underpinning decision-making and action has heen questioned, for inadequate or incomplete evidence seriously impedes policy formulation and implementation. In exploring ways in which evidence-informed management reviews might be achieved, the authors evaluate the process of systematic review used in the medical sciences. Over the last fifteen years, medical science has attempted to improve the review process hy synthesizing research in a systematic, transparent, and reproducihie manner with the twin aims of enhancing the knowledge hase and informing policymaking and practice. This paper evaluates the extent to which the process of systematic review can be applied to the management field in order to produce a reliable knowledge stock and enhanced practice by developing context-sensitive research. The paper highlights the challenges in developing an appropriate methodology.
7,020 citations
••
TL;DR: In today's uncertain and turbulent markets, supply chain vulnerability has become an issue of significance for many companies as discussed by the authors, and the challenge to business today is to manage and mitigate that risk through creating more resilient supply chains.
Abstract: In today's uncertain and turbulent markets, supply chain vulnerability has become an issue of significance for many companies. As supply chains become more complex as a result of global sourcing and the continued trend to “leaning‐down”, supply chain risk increases. The challenge to business today is to manage and mitigate that risk through creating more resilient supply chains.
2,440 citations
••
TL;DR: Further investigations of mechanical properties at the "materials level", in addition to the studies at the 'structural level' are needed to fill the gap in present knowledge and to achieve a complete understanding of the mechanical properties of bone.
2,352 citations
••
Imperial College London1, RWTH Aachen University2, Cranfield University3, Loughborough University4, University of Sheffield5, Massachusetts Institute of Technology6, United States Department of Energy7, Newcastle University8, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation9, University of California, Berkeley10, University of Cambridge11, Carnegie Mellon University12, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne13, University of Melbourne14, Colorado School of Mines15
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review the current state-of-the-art of CO2 capture, transport, utilisation and storage from a multi-scale perspective, moving from the global to molecular scales.
Abstract: Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is broadly recognised as having the potential to play a key role in meeting climate change targets, delivering low carbon heat and power, decarbonising industry and, more recently, its ability to facilitate the net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere. However, despite this broad consensus and its technical maturity, CCS has not yet been deployed on a scale commensurate with the ambitions articulated a decade ago. Thus, in this paper we review the current state-of-the-art of CO2 capture, transport, utilisation and storage from a multi-scale perspective, moving from the global to molecular scales. In light of the COP21 commitments to limit warming to less than 2 °C, we extend the remit of this study to include the key negative emissions technologies (NETs) of bioenergy with CCS (BECCS), and direct air capture (DAC). Cognisant of the non-technical barriers to deploying CCS, we reflect on recent experience from the UK's CCS commercialisation programme and consider the commercial and political barriers to the large-scale deployment of CCS. In all areas, we focus on identifying and clearly articulating the key research challenges that could usefully be addressed in the coming decade.
2,088 citations
Authors
Showing all 10090 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Xiang Zhang | 154 | 1733 | 117576 |
Richard J.H. Smith | 118 | 1308 | 61779 |
Lin Li | 104 | 2027 | 61709 |
James F. Scott | 99 | 714 | 58515 |
Timothy J. Foster | 98 | 420 | 32338 |
John M. Ward | 83 | 388 | 26819 |
Qiming Zhang | 80 | 466 | 26046 |
Anthony Turner | 79 | 489 | 24734 |
Neville A. Stanton | 77 | 765 | 22819 |
Vinod Kumar | 77 | 815 | 26882 |
Stuart L. Cooper | 75 | 416 | 19414 |
Vijay Kumar Thakur | 74 | 375 | 17719 |
Ruikang K. Wang | 73 | 764 | 20026 |
Naresh Magan | 72 | 400 | 17511 |
Mark Rounsevell | 69 | 253 | 20296 |