D
David E. Sprott
Researcher at Washington State University
Publications - 102
Citations - 6701
David E. Sprott is an academic researcher from Washington State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Consumer behaviour & Brand management. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 96 publications receiving 5909 citations. Previous affiliations of David E. Sprott include Saint Petersburg State University & University of South Carolina.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale
TL;DR: Brand engagement in self-concept (BESC) is a generalized view of brands in relation to the self, with consumers varying in their tendency to include important brands as part of their selfconcepts as mentioned in this paper.
Posted Content
The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale
TL;DR: Brand engagement in self-concept (BESC) is a generalized view of brands in relation to the self, with consumers varying in their tendency to include important brands as part of their selfconcepts as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Adoption of Internet shopping: the role of consumer innovativeness
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the extent to which open processing and domain-specific innovativeness explain the conditions under which consumers move from general Internet usage to a product purchase via the Internet.
Journal ArticleDOI
It's beginning to smell (and sound) a lot like Christmas: the interactive effects of ambient scent and music in a retail setting
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored the effects of ambient scent and music on consumers' evaluations of a store, its environment and offered merchandise, and found that the effect of adding an ambient Christmas scent is moderated by the nature of the background music.
Journal ArticleDOI
The influence of tactile input on the evaluation of retail product offerings
TL;DR: In this paper, the influence of tactile input on evaluation of products has been investigated in four experiments, where tactile input was diagnostic, and depended on product quality, and individual differences in need for touch when there was no opportunity for multiple product comparisons.