D
David L. Donoho
Researcher at Stanford University
Publications - 273
Citations - 115802
David L. Donoho is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Wavelet & Compressed sensing. The author has an hindex of 110, co-authored 271 publications receiving 108027 citations. Previous affiliations of David L. Donoho include University of California, Berkeley & Western Geophysical.
Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Image decomposition: separation of texture from piecewise smooth content
TL;DR: In this paper, a combination of the Basis Pursuit Denoising (BPDN) algorithm and the Total-Variation (TV) regularization scheme is proposed for separating images into texture and piecewise smooth parts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Does the maximum entropy method improve sensitivity
TL;DR: The solution has a simple structure that helps explain several commonly observed features of maximum entropy reconstructions--for example, the biases in the recovered intensities and the fact that noise near the baseline is more successfully suppressed than is noise superimposed on broad features in the spectrum.
Book
Asymptotic minimaxity of false discovery rate thresholding for sparse exponential data
David L. Donoho,Jiashun Jin +1 more
TL;DR: This paper considers the application of FDR thresholding to a non-Gaussian setting, in hopes of learning whether the good asymptotic properties of Roosevelt thresholding as an estimation tool hold more broadly than just at the standard Gaussian model.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Universal Identifier for Computational Results
Matan Gavish,David L. Donoho +1 more
TL;DR: An existing software implementation of the Verifiable Computational Research discipline is described, and it is argued that it solves many of the crucial problems commonly facing computer-based and computer-aided research in various scientific fields.
Journal ArticleDOI
Neo-classical minimax problems, thresholding and adaptive function estimation
TL;DR: The scalar minimax results imply: Lepskii's results that it is not possible fully to adapt the unknown degree of smoothness without incurring a performance cost; and that simple thresholding of the empirical wavelet transform gives an estimate of a function at a fixed point which is, to within constants, optimally adaptive to unknown degreeof smoothness.