scispace - formally typeset
D

David V. Day

Researcher at Claremont McKenna College

Publications -  124
Citations -  16468

David V. Day is an academic researcher from Claremont McKenna College. The author has contributed to research in topics: Leader development & Leadership development. The author has an hindex of 49, co-authored 124 publications receiving 15228 citations. Previous affiliations of David V. Day include University of Western Australia & Singapore Management University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues

TL;DR: The LMX7 (7-item LMX) measure has the soundest psychometric properties of all instruments and is congruent with numerous empirical relationships associated with transformational leadership as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Leadership development:: A review in context

TL;DR: A recent review examines the field of leadership development through three contextual lenses: (1) understanding the difference between leader development and leadership development ( conceptual context); (2) reviewing how state-of-the-art development is being conducted in the context of ongoing organizational work ( practice context); and (3) summarizing previous research that has implications for leadership development as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory

TL;DR: The development of effective leaders and leadership behavior is a prominent concern in organizations of all types as discussed by the authors, and the theoretical and empirical literature on leader and leadership development published over the past 25 years, primarily focusing on research published in The Leadership Quarterly.
Journal ArticleDOI

Leadership capacity in teams

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the state of the field regarding leadership in teams and present a perspective that considers leadership as an outcome of team processes that provides resources for better team adaptation and performance in subsequent performance cycles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: An updated theoretical model of applicant reactions to selection procedures is proposed and tested using meta-analysis as discussed by the authors, which indicated that applicants who hold positive perceptions about selection are more likely to view the organization favorably and report stronger intentions to accept job offers and recommend the employer to others.