scispace - formally typeset
D

Dawid Pieper

Researcher at Witten/Herdecke University

Publications -  196
Citations -  4844

Dawid Pieper is an academic researcher from Witten/Herdecke University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systematic review & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 166 publications receiving 2808 citations. Previous affiliations of Dawid Pieper include Institute of Cancer Research.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview.

TL;DR: Overlaps must be reported in well-conducted overviews, and this can comprehensively be accomplished using the CCA method.
Journal ArticleDOI

Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews

TL;DR: Most reviews tend to support the presence of a surgeon volume-outcome relationship, most clear-cut in colorectal cancer, bariatric surgery, and breast cancer where reviews of high quality show large effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

The management of desmoid tumours : A joint global consensus-based guideline approach for adult and paediatric patients

Ben Alman, +57 more
TL;DR: An evidence-based, joint global consensus guideline approach to the management of Desmoid tumor focussing on molecular genetics, indications for an active treatment, and available systemic therapeutic options is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review

TL;DR: Single screening of the titles and abstracts of studies retrieved in bibliographic searches is not equivalent to double screening, as substantially more studies are missed, however, in the opinion such an approach could still represent an appropriate methodological shortcut in rapid reviews, as long as it is conducted by an experienced reviewer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review

TL;DR: Overviews of reviews often lack methodological rigor and methodological standards and reporting guidelines for overviews are needed to improve the quality of this new publication type.