scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Didier Bigo published in 2005"


Book
28 Apr 2005
TL;DR: Bigo and Elspeth as discussed by the authors discuss policing in the name of freedom and the legal framework of European labour migration, where does the State actually start? The contemporary governance of work and migration, John Crowley Looking at migrants as enemies.
Abstract: Contents: Introduction: policing in the name of freedom, Didier Bigo and Elspeth Guild The legal framework: who is entitled to move?, Elspeth Guild Frontier controls in the European Union: who is in control?, Didier Bigo Who is entitled to work and who is in charge? Understanding the legal framework of European labour migration, Elspeth Guild Where does the State actually start? The contemporary governance of work and migration, John Crowley Looking at migrants as enemies, Anastassia Tsoukala The control of the enemy within? Police intelligence in the French suburbs (banlieues) and its relevance for globalization, Laurent Bonelli Policing by dossier: identification and surveillance in an era of uncertainty and fear, Ayse Ceyhan Policing at a distance: Schengen visa policies, Didier Bigo and Elspeth Guild Bibliography Index.

263 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 2005
TL;DR: In this article, a discussion on the premises on which rest a specific vision of global security professionals and their cooperation against barbarism is proposed, as a natural consequence of the attacks suffered by the US, Australia, Turkey, Spain, and very recently the United-Kingdom.
Abstract: This article suggests a discussion on the premises on which rest a specific vision of global (in)security – as a « natural » consequence of the attacks suffered by the US, Australia, Turkey, Spain, and very recently the United-Kingdom – and the corollary of a unique and efficient solution: the globalisation of security professionals and their cooperation against barbarism. Referring to Pierre Bourdieu and Michel Foucault’s works, the author tries to understand when and how this discourse on the « globalisation of (in)security » developed through the notions of field of the professionals of unease management and of transnationalisation of (in)securisation processes. A particular attention is given to the way in which these processes are linked to the transformations of political violence but also to the European and Transatlantic development of the police, military, and intelligence agencies, to their structuration in a professional field, and to their effects on our societies of risk, doubt, and uncertainty.

68 citations


01 Jun 2005
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose to discuter les premisses sur lesquelles repose une certaine vision de l’insecurite globale, consequence of which is the mondialisation des professionnels de la securite and leur collaboration contre la barbarie.
Abstract: Cet article se propose de discuter les premisses sur lesquelles repose une certaine vision de l’insecurite globale – consequence « naturelle » des attentats ayant frappe les Etats-Unis, l’Australie, la Turquie, l’Espagne et tout recemment le Royaume-Uni – et le corollaire d’une solution efficace unique : la mondialisation des professionnels de la securite et leur collaboration contre la barbarie. Prenant appui sur les travaux de Pierre Bourdieu et de Michel Foucault, l’auteur se propose de comprendre quand et comment s’est developpe ce discours sur la « mondialisation de la securite » a travers les notions de champ des professionnels de la gestion des inquietudes, et de transnationalisation des processus d’(in)securisation. Une attention particuliere est portee sur la maniere dont ces processus sont lies aux transformations de la violence politique mais aussi au developpement europeen et transatlantique des appareils policiers, militaires, de renseignement, a leur structuration en un champ professionnel, et a leurs effets sur nos societes du risque, du doute, de l’incertitude.

19 citations




Book ChapterDOI
31 Mar 2005

7 citations


25 Feb 2005
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyse les usages du terme terrorisme and leurs implications and conclude that terrorisme is a forme de conflit specifique qui aurait sa propre unite and qui pourrait etre analyse selon une grille de le...
Abstract: Le terrorisme n'existe pas : ou plus exactement, ce n'est pas un concept utilisable par les sciences sociales et la strategie. En revanche l'usage du terme a une forte signification politique. Pour expliquer ce paradoxe apparent, il est necessaire d'analyser les usages du terme terrorisme et leurs implications. Nous qu'adversaires en presence comme tiers, victimes, font du terrorisme une forme de conflit specifique qui aurait sa propre unite et qui pourrait etre analyse selon une grille de le...

6 citations