scispace - formally typeset
D

Douglas W. Diamond

Researcher at University of Chicago

Publications -  85
Citations -  40885

Douglas W. Diamond is an academic researcher from University of Chicago. The author has contributed to research in topics: Market liquidity & Debt. The author has an hindex of 46, co-authored 85 publications receiving 38682 citations. Previous affiliations of Douglas W. Diamond include National Bureau of Economic Research.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity

TL;DR: The authors showed that bank deposit contracts can provide allocations superior to those of exchange markets, offering an explanation of how banks subject to runs can attract deposits, and showed that there are circumstances when government provision of deposit insurance can produce superior contracts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed a theory of financial intermediation based on minimizing the cost of monitoring information which is useful for resolving incentive problems between borrowers and lenders, and presented a characterization of the costs of providing incentives for delegated monitoring by a financial intermediary.
Journal ArticleDOI

Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital

TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied the causes and consequences of a security's liquidity, especially the effect of future liquidity on the security's current price-equivalently the effect on its required expected rate of return, its cost of capital.
Journal ArticleDOI

Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice between Bank Loans and Directly Placed Debt

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors determine when a debt contract will be monitored by lenders, which is the choice between borrowing directly (issuing a bond, without monitoring) and borrowing through a bank that monitors to alleviate moral hazard.
Journal ArticleDOI

Constraints on short-selling and asset price adjustment to private information

TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of short-sale constraints on the speed of adjustment (to private information) of security prices are modeled. But short-sellers do not bias prices upward, while non-prohibitive costs have the reverse effect.