https://www.massey.ac.nz/~ychisti/Biodiesel.pdf

Biodiesel from microalgae.

Sustainable production of renewable energy is being hotly debated globally since it is increasingly understood that first generation biofuels, primarily produced from food crops and mostly oil seeds are limited in their ability to achieve targets for biofuel production, climate change mitigation and economic growth. These concerns have increased the interest in developing second generation biofuels produced from non-food feedstocks such as microalgae, which potentially offer greatest opportunities in the longer term. This paper reviews the current status of microalgae use for biodiesel production, including their cultivation, harvesting, and processing. The microalgae species most used for biodiesel production are presented and their main advantages described in comparison with other available biodiesel feedstocks. The various aspects associated with the design of microalgae production units are described, giving an overview of the current state of development of algae cultivation systems (photo-bioreactors and open ponds). Other potential applications and products from microalgae are also presented such as for biological sequestration of CO 2 , wastewater treatment, in human health, as food additive, and for aquaculture.

/pdf/microalgae-for-biodiesel-production-and-other-applications-a-54vmwufrsu.pdf

Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review

Sustainability is a key principle in natural resource management, and it involves operational efficiency, minimisation of environmental impact and socio-economic considerations; all of which are interdependent. It has become increasingly obvious that continued reliance on fossil fuel energy resources is unsustainable, owing to both depleting world reserves and the green house gas emissions associated with their use. Therefore, there are vigorous research initiatives aimed at developing alternative renewable and potentially carbon neutral solid, liquid and gaseous biofuels as alternative energy resources. However, alternate energy resources akin to first generation biofuels derived from terrestrial crops such as sugarcane, sugar beet, maize and rapeseed place an enormous strain on world food markets, contribute to water shortages and precipitate the destruction of the world's forests. Second generation biofuels derived from lignocellulosic agriculture and forest residues and from non-food crop feedstocks address some of the above problems; however there is concern over competing land use or required land use changes. Therefore, based on current knowledge and technology projections, third generation biofuels specifically derived from microalgae are considered to be a technically viable alternative energy resource that is devoid of the major drawbacks associated with first and second generation biofuels. Microalgae are photosynthetic microorganisms with simple growing requirements (light, sugars, CO 2 , N, P, and K) that can produce lipids, proteins and carbohydrates in large amounts over short periods of time. These products can be processed into both biofuels and valuable co-products. This study reviewed the technologies underpinning microalgae-to-biofuels systems, focusing on the biomass production, harvesting, conversion technologies, and the extraction of useful co-products. It also reviewed the synergistic coupling of microalgae propagation with carbon sequestration and wastewater treatment potential for mitigation of environmental impacts associated with energy conversion and utilisation. It was found that, whereas there are outstanding issues related to photosynthetic efficiencies and biomass output, microalgae-derived biofuels could progressively substitute a significant proportion of the fossil fuels required to meet the growing energy demand.

/pdf/biofuels-from-microalgae-a-review-of-technologies-for-1t1wwr5e69.pdf

Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products

https://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/2771/1/joannis-cassan_2771.pdf

Commercial applications of microalgae

The use of fossil fuels is now widely accepted as unsustainable due to depleting resources and the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the environment that have already exceeded the “dangerously high” threshold of 450 ppm CO2-e. To achieve environmental and economic sustainability, fuel production processes are required that are not only renewable, but also capable of sequestering atmospheric CO2. Currently, nearly all renewable energy sources (e.g. hydroelectric, solar, wind, tidal, geothermal) target the electricity market, while fuels make up a much larger share of the global energy demand (∼66%). Biofuels are therefore rapidly being developed. Second generation microalgal systems have the advantage that they can produce a wide range of feedstocks for the production of biodiesel, bioethanol, biomethane and biohydrogen. Biodiesel is currently produced from oil synthesized by conventional fuel crops that harvest the sun’s energy and store it as chemical energy. This presents a route for renewable and carbon-neutral fuel production. However, current supplies from oil crops and animal fats account for only approximately 0.3% of the current demand for transport fuels. Increasing biofuel production on arable land could have severe consequences for global food supply. In contrast, producing biodiesel from algae is widely regarded as one of the most efficient ways of generating biofuels and also appears to represent the only current renewable source of oil that could meet the global demand for transport fuels. The main advantages of second generation microalgal systems are that they: (1) Have a higher photon conversion efficiency (as evidenced by increased biomass yields per hectare): (2) Can be harvested batch-wise nearly all-year-round, providing a reliable and continuous supply of oil: (3) Can utilize salt and waste water streams, thereby greatly reducing freshwater use: (4) Can couple CO2-neutral fuel production with CO2 sequestration: (5) Produce non-toxic and highly biodegradable biofuels. Current limitations exist mainly in the harvesting process and in the supply of CO2 for high efficiency production. This review provides a brief overview of second generation biodiesel production systems using microalgae.

https://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/BioEnergyResearch_Second+Generation+Biofuels+High-Efficiency+Microalgae+for+Biodiesel+Production.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1347846-0

Second generation biofuels: high-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production

Preservation of the marine microalga, Isochrysis galbana: influence on the fatty acid profile

Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) was obtained from the microalgaPhaeodactylum tricornutum following a three-step process: fatty acid extraction by direct saponification of wet biomass, polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) concentration by formation of urea inclusion compounds and EPA isolation by preparative HPLC. Direct saponification of wet biomass was carried out with KOH-ethanol (96% v:v) (1 h, 60 °C), extracting 91% of the EPA. PUFAs were concentrated by the urea method with an urea/fatty acid ratio of 4:1 at a crystallization temperature of 28 °C using methanol as the urea solvent. An EPA concentration ratio of 1.5 (55.2/36.3) and recovery of 79% were obtained. This PUFA concentrate was used to obtain 95.8% pure EPA by preparative HPLC, using a reverse-phase column (C18, 4.7 cm i.d. × 30 cm) and methanol-water (1% AcH) 80:20 w/w as the mobile phase. Ninety-seven per cent of EPA loaded was recovered and 70% EPA present in theP. tricornutum biomass was recovered in a highly pure form by means of this three-step downstream processing. In each of the HPLC preparative runs, 635 mg PUFA concentrate were loaded, obtaining 326 mg of a highly concentrated EPA fraction (2.46 g d−1). Finally, a preliminary cost statement has been calculated.

Gram-scale purification of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) from wet Phaeodactylum tricornutum UTEX 640 biomass

Outdoor culture of Isochrysis galbana ALII-4 in a closed tubular photobioreactor

Eicosapentaenoic acid (FPA, 20:5n-3) and arachidonic acid (AA, 20:4n-3)were obtained from the microalga Porphyridium cruentum by a three-stepprocess: fatty acid extraction by direct saponification of biomass,polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) concentration by urea inclusion complexingand EPA isolation by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Twosolvents were tested for direct saponification of lipids in biomass. Themost efficient solvent, ethanol (96% v/v), extracted 75% ofthe fatty acids. PUFAs concentration by urea inclusion employed a urea/fattyacid ratio of 4:1 wt/wt at the crystallization temperatures of 4°C and28°C. Concentration factors were similar at both temperatures, but theEPA and AA recoveries were higher at 28°C (67.7% and 61.8%for the two acids, respectively). EPA and AA were purified from this PUFAconcentrate using analytical scale HPLC and the best results of thisseparation were scaled up to preparative level (4.7 i. d. × 30 cmcompression radial cartridge). A 94.3% pure EPA fraction and a81.4% pure AA fraction were obtained. Suitability of severalmicroalgae (Porphyridium cruentum, Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Isochrysisgalbana) and cod liver oil as sources of highly pure PUFAs, mainly EPA, wascompared.

Downstream processing and purification of eicosapentaenoic (20:5n-3) and arachidonic acids (20:4n-6) from the microalga Porphyridium cruentum

Dinoflagellates have proven extremely difficult to culture because they are inhibited by low-level shear forces. Specific growth rate of the toxic dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum was greatly decreased compared with static control culture by intermittent exposure to a turbulent hydrodynamic environment with a bulk average shear rate that was as low as 0.3 s−1. Hydrodynamic forces appeared to induce the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within the cells and this caused peroxidation of cellular lipids and ultimately cell damage. Exposure to damaging levels of shear rate correlated with the elevated level of lipoperoxides in the cells, but ROS levels measured directly by flow cytometry did not correlate with shear induced cell damage. This was apparently because the measured level of ROS could not distinguish between the ROS that are normally generated by photosynthesis and the additional ROS produced as a consequence of hydrodynamic shear forces. Continuously subjecting the cells to a bulk average shear rate value of about 0.3 s−1 for 24-h caused an elevation in the levels of chlorophyll a, peridinin and dinoxanthin, as the cells apparently attempted to counter the damaging effects of shear fields by producing pigments that are potential antioxidants. In static culture, limitation of carbon dioxide produced a small but measureable increase in ROS. The addition of ascorbic acid (0.1 mM) to the culture medium resulted in a significant protective effect on lipid peroxidation, allowing cells to grow under damaging levels of shear rates. This confirmed the use of antioxidant additives as an efficient strategy to counter the damaging effects of turbulence in photobioreactors where shear sensitive dinoflagellates are cultivated. © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2009

/pdf/causes-of-shear-sensitivity-of-the-toxic-dinoflagellate-21tmjjpx7c.pdf

E. Molina Grima

Papers

Preservation of the marine microalga, Isochrysis galbana: influence on the fatty acid profile

Gram-scale purification of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) from wet Phaeodactylum tricornutum UTEX 640 biomass

Outdoor culture of Isochrysis galbana ALII-4 in a closed tubular photobioreactor

Downstream processing and purification of eicosapentaenoic (20:5n-3) and arachidonic acids (20:4n-6) from the microalga Porphyridium cruentum

Causes of Shear Sensitivity of the Toxic Dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum