scispace - formally typeset
E

Edi Karni

Researcher at Johns Hopkins University

Publications -  175
Citations -  9298

Edi Karni is an academic researcher from Johns Hopkins University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Subjective expected utility & Expected utility hypothesis. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 170 publications receiving 8797 citations. Previous affiliations of Edi Karni include University of Chicago & University of Warwick.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the reasons for and determinants of the provision by a firm of false information to a consumer so as to induce purchases which would not be made if the consumer possessed full information about the qualities of his purchase.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define measures of risk aversion for such preferences which characterize the relation "more risk averse" and apply these measures to the analysis of unconditional and conditional portfolio choice problems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preference reversal and the observability of preferences by experimental methods

Edi Karni, +1 more
- 01 May 1987 - 
TL;DR: This paper showed that preference reversal can be consistent with transitive preferences if these preferences violate the independence axiom of expected utility theory and for the class of experiments that were used to produce the evidence concerning preference reversal, elicitation of certainty equivalents is possible if, and only if, the respondent's preferences can be represented by functionals that are linear in the probabilities.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Mechanism for Eliciting Probabilities

TL;DR: In this paper, a direct revelation mechanism for eliciting agents' subjective probabilities is described, and the game induced by the mechanism has a dominant strategy equilibrium in which the players reveal their subjective probabilities.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: New experimental evidence regarding Linda

TL;DR: The results of a series of experiments designed to test whether and to what extent individuals succumb to the conjunction fallacy are reported, finding that given mild incentives, the proportion of individuals who violate the conjunction principle is significantly lower than that reported by Kahneman and Tversky.