E
Elizabeth Gargon
Researcher at University of Liverpool
Publications - 51
Citations - 4933
Elizabeth Gargon is an academic researcher from University of Liverpool. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systematic review & Health care. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 49 publications receiving 3730 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.
Paula R Williamson,Douglas G. Altman,Jane M Blazeby,Mike Clarke,Declan Devane,Elizabeth Gargon,Peter Tugwell +6 more
TL;DR: The need for general guidance on the development of core outcome sets, which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all trials for a specific clinical area, is identified.
Journal ArticleDOI
The COMET Handbook: Version 1.0
Paula R Williamson,Douglas G. Altman,Heather Bagley,Karen L. Barnes,Jane M Blazeby,Sara T Brookes,Mike Clarke,Mike Clarke,Elizabeth Gargon,Sarah L. Gorst,Nicola Harman,Jamie J Kirkham,Angus G K McNair,Cecilia A.C. Prinsen,Jochen Schmitt,Caroline B. Terwee,Bridget Young +16 more
TL;DR: A four-step process to develop a core outcome set is recommended, an agreed standardised collection of outcomes which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all trials for a specific clinical area.
Journal ArticleDOI
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.
Jamie J Kirkham,Sarah L. Gorst,Douglas G. Altman,Jane M Blazeby,Mike Clarke,Declan Devane,Elizabeth Gargon,David Moher,Jochen Schmitt,Peter Tugwell,Sean Tunis,Paula R Williamson +11 more
TL;DR: The COS-STAR Statement is a helpful resource to improve the reporting of COS studies for the benefit of all COS users and may need to evolve over time to encompass any additional challenges from developing COS in these areas.
Journal ArticleDOI
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.
Elizabeth Gargon,Binu Gurung,Nancy Medley,Douglas G. Altman,Jane M Blazeby,Mike Clarke,Paula R Williamson +6 more
TL;DR: This systematic review identified many health areas where a COS has been developed, but also highlights important gaps, and shows the need for methodological guidance, including how to engage key stakeholder groups, particularly members of the public.
Journal ArticleDOI
Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes.
TL;DR: The development of core outcome sets would enhance the value of evidence synthesis by reducing the risk of outcome reporting bias and ensuring that all trials contribute usable information, and increase the efficiency and value of research.